17TH LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT COMMITTEE REPUBLICAN

01

Money in — who funds this committee

The largest reported contributions. Washington requires committees to itemise contributions above a threshold; smaller gifts are reported in aggregate.

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28 · $11,313 of $13,525 shown across 20 of 59 contributors

02

How concentrated the money is

Computed from every itemised contribution rather than from the largest few, which is what makes the share meaningful.

Who it came from

The PDC types every contributor. This does not follow a PAC’s own money back to a person — see what this page will not compute — but it does say how much arrived from individuals rather than from other organisations.

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28

03

Money out — where it went

Who it paid

Largest payees, with the category the committee chose when filing. A consultancy, printer or polling firm appearing across many committees is a fact about who runs campaigns in Washington.

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings · as of 2026-07-28

04

Does it add up

The arithmetic, in the open. Reported contributions less reported spending is what the committee should still be holding.

Reported contributions $13,525

Reported expenditures − $7,927

Implied balance $5,598

This is what the two filings imply, not a bank balance. Committees also report cash on hand directly, and the two figures can differ where a report is outstanding.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

05

Across cycles

Other filings under the same PDC committee id.

06

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

Who is really behind a committee that funds this one

We show every contributor the committee reported, and how much of its money came from organisations rather than individuals. A committee funded by another committee is common, and following that chain to the people at the end of it means joining filings across organisations and cycles — a join we have not made, and one that would be wrong to guess at.

Who the independent spending was aimed at

The filings name the candidate or measure each independent expenditure supported or opposed. We hold the amounts and which way they cut, but have not joined them to those records, so the page says how much and not against whom.

Whether the spending worked

We hold what was raised, what was spent, and in some cases the result. Connecting them would be a causal claim from two numbers, and spending is not the only thing that moves an election.

Anything below the itemisation threshold

Washington lets small contributions and small expenses be reported as lump sums with no counterparty. That money is in the totals and cannot be broken out by anyone, including the PDC. Where a lump is large, the page says so.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“17TH LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT COMMITTEE REPUBLICAN,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-07-28, accessed 2026-08-08. https://washingtonindependents.org/committee/17th-legislative-district-committee-republican/

06

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

Public Disclosure Commission committee filings

Registration, contribution and expenditure totals, and the largest reported contributors. The original record is at the PDC.

Not loaded

Itemised expenditures, contributor employers, gift-size banding, and independent expenditure filings. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.