Political committee · Washington State

Washington Independent Bankers PAC

Washington Independent Bankers PAC is a political committee registered with the Washington Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle. It reported $2,260 from 8 contributors.

2026 cycle
Political Committee
8 contributors

$2,260

raised

spent

$282

average contribution

The total divided by the reported contributor count.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

Money in — who funds this committee

The largest reported contributions. Washington requires committees to itemise contributions above a threshold; smaller gifts are reported in aggregate.

Largest reported contributors
Contributor	City	Amount
WASHINGTON TRUST BANK	SPOKANE	$1,500
1st Security Bank	Mountlake Terrace	$500
OLYMPIA FEDERAL SAVINGS	OLYMPIA	$250
MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS		$10

Contributions are not broken down by size, and employers are not named. Washington collects an employer field for individual contributions, and gift-size banding is what separates a committee funded by a hundred neighbours from one funded by three donors. We store only the largest contributors, so neither analysis is possible here — and computing concentration from a top-ten list would produce a confident number that is simply wrong.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28 · $2,260 of $2,260 shown across 4 of 8 contributors

How concentrated the money is

Computed from every itemised contribution rather than from the largest few, which is what makes the share meaningful.

100%

from the top 10 donors

Out of 8 itemised contributors in total.

itemised contributors

Who it came from

The PDC types every contributor. This does not follow a PAC’s own money back to a person — see what this page will not compute — but it does say how much arrived from individuals rather than from other organisations.

Contributions by contributor type
Contributor type	Amount	Share	Gifts
Business	$2,250	100%	3

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28

Money out — where it went

total spent

of what it raised

Spending as a share of contributions received.

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings · as of 2026-07-28

Does it add up

The arithmetic, in the open. Reported contributions less reported spending is what the committee should still be holding.

Reported contributions $2,260

Reported expenditures − $0

Implied balance $2,260

This is what the two filings imply, not a bank balance. Committees also report cash on hand directly, and the two figures can differ where a report is outstanding.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

Across cycles

Other filings under the same PDC committee id.

Only one cycle on file. We hold a single filing for committee 20708. That means it registered for one election, or that our sync covers only the cycles this one falls in — the filings do not distinguish the two.

Last checked 2026-07-28

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

Who is really behind a committee that funds this one: We show every contributor the committee reported, and how much of its money came from organisations rather than individuals. A committee funded by another committee is common, and following that chain to the people at the end of it means joining filings across organisations and cycles — a join we have not made, and one that would be wrong to guess at.
Who the independent spending was aimed at: The filings name the candidate or measure each independent expenditure supported or opposed. We hold the amounts and which way they cut, but have not joined them to those records, so the page says how much and not against whom.
Whether the spending worked: We hold what was raised, what was spent, and in some cases the result. Connecting them would be a causal claim from two numbers, and spending is not the only thing that moves an election.
Anything below the itemisation threshold: Washington lets small contributions and small expenses be reported as lump sums with no counterparty. That money is in the totals and cannot be broken out by anyone, including the PDC. Where a lump is large, the page says so.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Washington Independent Bankers PAC,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-07-28, accessed 2026-08-09. https://washingtonindependents.org/committee/washington-independent-bankers-pac/

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

Public Disclosure Commission committee filings: Registration, contribution and expenditure totals, and the largest reported contributors. The original record is at the PDC.
Not loaded: Itemised expenditures, contributor employers, gift-size banding, and independent expenditure filings. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.