Ballot measure · Washington State

City of Seattle Proposition No. 1 — King County 2025

City of Seattle Proposition No. 1 — King County 2025 was on the 2025 ballot in King County, Washington. It passed with 80% voting yes, on 271,734 votes cast.

  • 2025
  • King County
  • City Measure
  • Proposition 1
  • Passed

Source WA Secretary of State official election results · as of 2026-08-07

01

The result

80%

voted yes

Passed

certified outcome

271,734

votes cast on this measure

Yes 80% · No 20%

Source WA Secretary of State certified election results · as of 2026-08-07

02

What it costs you

We cannot calculate what this measure costs a household. That figure needs the levy rate per thousand dollars of assessed value, and the result export does not carry it — it records how people voted, not what they were voting on. We will not estimate it: a wrong number on a household tax bill is worse than no number. The rate is published in the county assessor’s levy certification and in the voters’ pamphlet for the election.

Last checked 2026-08-07

03

The case for and against

Printed in the county voters’ pamphlet and mailed to every voter in the jurisdiction. Written by committees the jurisdiction appointed, and reproduced here exactly as they wrote them.

Statement in favor

Written by Bruce Harrell, Maritza Rivera, Tricia Schroeder everychildreadyseattle.com

Every Seattle child deserves quality early learning, safety and health throughout their K-12 education, and access to college or career training. Every Child Ready– updating the Families, Education, Preschool and Promise Levy– expands and renews programs that help kids at every stage of learning, regardless of income or zip code. Doubling Affordable Childcare: The levy doubles assistance for families struggling with childcare costs– serving 1,400 families and stabilizing the childcare workforce. The levy supports early learning programs that reduce inequities and help kids enter Kindergarten ready to learn. Keeping Kids Healthy: Your vote adds in-school health clinics; ensuring students in 34 Seattle Public Schools can access medically accurate consultation and care, including on-call behavioral health counseling. The levy invests in summer and after- school programs that provide safe, nurturing places to learn. College and Career Readiness: Prop 1 maintains Seattle Promise– free two-year tuition for any Seattle high school graduate at Seattle Colleges, with pathways to four-year degrees. The levy adds outreach to help kids interested in skilled trades and other family-wage jobs. Join Mayor Bruce Harrell, a unanimous City Council, unions including SEIU 925 representing childcare workers, businesses, education child health advocates, and more in support of Prop 1. Rebuttal of statement in opposition This renewal more than doubles affordable childcare, a top concern of cost-sensitive families, and maintains college and career readiness programs that have helped thousands of young people succeed. K-12 investments provide essential health care and wraparound services, and are updated to include mental health and increased community -based support. This levy receives independent oversight and has won national recognition – please vote Yes for our kids and families.

Statement in opposition

Written by Ari Hoffman

Despite the FEPP levy’s stated goals, grades and academic performance have not improved as intended; they have worsened. Seattle families are being burdened with yet another tax in an already unaffordable city while failing to deliver the gains voters were told to expect. This measure equates to roughly $654 annually for a median-valued home. Year after year, despite this levy, students have seen stagnant or declining academic outcomes. During the pandemic, overall math and ELA proficiency dropped across Seattle Public Schools, even among FEPP-supported students, and continues to remain below pre-pandemic levels. Additionally, student mental health continues to deteriorate. Rates of depression, anxiety, and absenteeism have increased, even as levy funds have been allocated toward social-emotional and wellness programs. The trend shows that more money hasn’t produced the promised results, raising questions about oversight and accountability. Meanwhile, Seattle’s cost of living continues to climb. Introducing another levy only adds to this financial strain, offering no benefit in return. The FEPP levy has failed to deliver the promised academic turnaround. Its renewal would place an unjustifiable burden on residents in a city already grappling with affordability crises. We deserve better outcomes, not higher taxes to prop up failed programs. Vote No. Rebuttal of statement in favor Raising taxes doesn’t make childcare or education more affordable—it just shifts the burden onto struggling families and small businesses. This levy has been in place for years, yet two-thirds of Washington students still aren’t at grade level in reading or math. Despite record revenues, outcomes keep getting worse. These programs are not delivering results. Instead of taxing more, Seattle should reform spending, cut waste, and demand accountability before taking another dollar from taxpayers.

Neither statement is fact-checked, by the county or by us. King County Elections prints these as the committees submit them and does not correct punctuation, grammar, or accuracy. They are arguments, not findings. We reproduce them because they are what voters were sent, and we take no position on the claims in either one.

Last checked 2026-08-07

Source King County voters’ pamphlet · as of 2026-08-07 · page 89 of the pamphlet

The pamphlet as published · archived copy, which is what we read

04

Who is funding each side

Political committees registered with the Public Disclosure Commission that named this proposition number when they formed.

No committee named this proposition number. We searched PDC committee filings for proposition 1 in 2025 and found none. That can mean no committee formed, or that one formed without naming the number — the filings do not distinguish the two.

Last checked 2026-08-07

05

What this county has asked before

Other city measures put to King County voters. Matched on county and measure kind — the results export carries no jurisdiction key, so these are comparable measures rather than provably the same body asking again.

Source WA Secretary of State certified election results · as of 2026-08-07 · 8 of 8 passed

06

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

What it costs a household
Requires the levy rate per thousand of assessed value, which the results export does not carry. Stated above rather than estimated.
Whether the money decided it
We can show what each side raised and what the vote was. Connecting the two would be an inference about cause from two numbers, and campaign spending is not the only thing that moves a local levy.
Whether this is the same body asking again
Earlier measures are matched on county and kind, not on jurisdiction — the export has no jurisdiction key. A school district and its neighbour both appear as school measures in the same county.
What the measure would have done
The ballot title and the full text are not loaded. We hold the result, not the proposal.

07

Common questions

Did City of Seattle Proposition No. 1 — King County 2025 pass?
Yes, it passed. 80% voted yes on 271,734 votes cast.
Which Proposition 1 is this?
Proposition 1 on the 2025 ballot in King County, Washington. Several different measures can carry the same number on one county ballot, so the year, the county and the body asking are all needed to identify one.
Where do these results come from?
The Washington Secretary of State’s certified election results. We publish the certified canvass, not election-night returns.
Why is there no argument for or against here?
Washington publishes committee-written for and against statements for most local measures. We have not ingested them. Showing one side without the other would be worse than showing neither.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“City of Seattle Proposition No. 1 — King County 2025,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-08-07, accessed 2026-08-09. https://washingtonindependents.org/measure/2025-king-prop-1-city-of-seattle-proposition-no-1/

08

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

WA Secretary of State certified election results
The vote totals, the yes share and the outcome. Certified canvass, not election-night returns.
Public Disclosure Commission committee registrations
Committees formed for or against the measure, matched by the proposition number they registered. Committees that did not name a number are not linked here.
Not loaded
Ballot title and full text, the voters’ pamphlet for and against statements, and the levy rate. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.