Nadine Woodward

Nadine Woodward has won 1 election in Washington (2019), most recently as City of Spokane Mayor.

  • No party listed

No contact details on file. The election returns this page is built from carry no contact details for this office.

Source WA Secretary of State official election results · as of 2026-09-16

05

Who funds this seat

Campaign finance reported to the Public Disclosure Commission. The record and the PDC share no identifier, so this is a join — on surname, given name, chamber and district for a legislator, and on the office won and the county it was won in for everyone else. Only where one person fits.

$572K

raised, 2023 cycle

$577K

spent

$836

average contribution

Total divided by 684 reported contributors.

$869K

raised across 2 campaigns

Every cycle we hold for this filer, not a career total — earlier campaigns may predate our coverage.

By campaign

Reported campaign finance by cycle
Cycle Raised Spent Contributors
2023 $572,104 $577,491 684
2019 $296,982 $289,224 770

Largest reported contributors

Largest reported contributors
Contributor City Amount
RenCorpRealty Spokane $2,912
6414 S Helena LLC Spokane Valley $2,400
ABC PAC WA ABC PAC WA Spokane $2,400
Alvin J Wolff INC Scottsdale $2,400
Basalt Hospitality L.P. Spokane $2,400
Beau Rivage 324 LLC Liberty Lake $2,400
Becker Buick-GMC Inc. Spokane $2,400
Blue Chip Alliance, LLC Spokane $2,400
BROWNSTONE HOMES, LLC Liberty Lake $2,400
Build East PAC Spokane $2,400
Clise Properties, INC Spokane $2,400
Companies Leavitt Capital Spokane Valley $2,400

Individual contributors, by stated employer

Private individuals are not named here unless their own public conduct already makes them a public figure; their giving appears aggregated by the employer they stated. The full itemised record is public at the PDC.

Individual contributors, grouped by stated employer
Employer stated by contributors Contributors Amount
No employer stated 3 $7,200

Employers behind more than one donor

Across the whole cycle rather than a single day. Weaker than the table above, and included because a slow accumulation from one workplace is still worth being able to see.

Employers with more than one contributor this cycle
Employer Donors Total
NOT PROVIDED 3 $3,600
Living Water 2 $3,400
Providence 2 $3,150
Trudeau's Marina 2 $3,000
Spokane Hardware Supply 2 $2,900
Windermere 2 $2,700
Plese Realty LLC 2 $2,250
NAI Black 2 $2,000
Spokane County 4 $1,700
Baker Construction 2 $1,500

Only 22.8% of named donors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor and left blank more often than not, so both tables show what we can see rather than everything that exists. Treat the counts as a floor. Occupations reported in the employer box — “retired”, “self-employed”, “homemaker” — are excluded, because they are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-09-16

This filing was matched, not looked up. The election returns and the PDC share no identifier. We matched Nadine Woodward to PDC filer WOODN 203 because the surname, the given name and the office won (City of Spokane Mayor) all agree, in the county it was won in, and because only one person fits. If that is the wrong person, tell us at corrections@washingtonindependents.org and we will unpublish this section while we check — see Corrections.

Last checked 2026-09-16

Spent independently, for and against · not their money

Money spent about this member by committees that are barred by law from coordinating with them. It is not their money, they cannot return it, and it is not in the total above. Spending for someone is not money from them, and the two sides are never subtracted from each other.

  1. Spent supporting

    stance filed as “for”

    $695,519
  2. Spent opposing

    stance filed as “against” · not subtracted from the row above

    $345,368
  • WASHINGTON REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE for · $308,756 · 2023, 2019
  • Spokane Good Government Alliance for · $253,999 · 2023, 2019
  • CITIZENS FOR LIBERTY AND LABOR against · $218,933 · 2019
  • CITIZENS FOR LIBERTY AND LABOR PAC against · $125,767 · 2023
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS FUND for · $101,091 · 2023
  • CASCADE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE for · $17,385 · 2023
  • CONCERNED TAXPAYERS OF WASHINGTON STATE for · $9,356 · 2019
  • WASHINGTON MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING ASSOCIATION PAC for · $4,000 · 2023
  • QUESTION PAC against · $576 · 2019
  • SPOKANE HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PAC for · $536 · 2019
  • POOLE SHAWN for · $272 · 2019
  • SPOKANE COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE for · $125 · 2023

Showing 12 of 13 spenders. Every one is in the totals above.

Sources WA PDC C-3 contribution reports · C-6 independent expenditure and electioneering communication reports · as of 2026-09-16 · filer WOODN 203 · key office won + county it was won in — refused where more than one person fits · n 90 independent-expenditure filings name this candidate id · note independent expenditures are joined on the PDC candidate id, not on a name; they are a separate ledger, never netted against each other and never added to the committee’s own total

10

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

What the money bought
Where a filing is matched we show what was raised and from whom. Connecting that to how the member voted would be a causal claim from two records that were never linked, and campaign money is not the only thing that moves a vote.
A complete funding career
Cycles are shown back to 2009. A member who served before that has earlier campaigns we do not hold, so the career total is a floor rather than a lifetime figure.
Employers we cannot see
The employer field is filled in by the donor and left blank more often than not, so the bundling table shows employers we can see rather than every one that exists.
Whether a difference was a broken promise
Where a stated position and a vote differ we show both records and say only that they differ. Why is not in either one — an amendment, a procedural vote, or a bill that changed under the member all produce the same pair.
A complete set of statements
Positions are found and cited one at a time by a person. An empty or short list means nobody has done that reading, not that a member has said little.
Advertising
Meta’s ad library and PDC independent expenditures targeting this member are both public and neither is loaded.
What a divergent vote means
We can say a member voted against their party’s majority on a given roll call. Whether that was principle, a local interest, a drafting objection or a trade is not in the record, and the count is not a measure of independence.
Committee influence
Chair and ranking-member roles decide which bills get heard. The roster gives membership without role, so every seat here looks alike.
A member’s response
The design reserves space for one. We have no process yet for soliciting or publishing it, so the section is absent rather than empty.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Nadine Woodward,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-16, accessed 2026-10-15. https://washingtonindependents.org/official/nadine-woodward/

JSON endpointReport a correction

Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.

12

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

WA Legislature member roster
Name, party, district, chamber and contact details, per session served.
WA Legislature roll call service
Every recorded floor vote. Committee votes are recorded per committee rather than per member and are not included.
Party divergence
Derived, not published by the Legislature. For each roll call we take the majority position of the member’s own party and flag votes against it, counting only roll calls where that party had a clear majority.
WA Legislature legislation records
Prime sponsorship, and each bill’s outcome and hearing status. Co-sponsorship is not in the record we hold.
Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings
Contributions, expenditures, the largest reported contributors and their stated employers, for every cycle back to 2007. Matched on surname and given name plus chamber and district for a legislator, or the office won and the county it was won in for everyone else — never on name alone — and only published where one person fits. Across the record that resolves 1,938 of 13,879 officials over 3,548 cycles, with 45 refused as ambiguous; the rest say why they did not match.
Not loaded
Public statements, advertising, committee roles, and committee votes by member.