Candidate · PDC filing · 2026 cycle · filer NANDJ 037
Jenna Nand
Jenna Nand is running for State Representative in Leg District 32 – House in 2026. This page is the campaign’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission: what it raised, who gave it, where it went, and what others spent about the candidate. It is not a record of holding office; that is a different page.
- Filed as
- Jenna Jotika Nand
- Office, as filed
- STATE REPRESENTATIVE · LEG DISTRICT 32 – HOUSE
- Party preference
- as stated on the filing: DEMOCRATIC
Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings (C-1) and reports (C-3, C-4) · as of 2026-09-12 · key PDC filer id — the one identifier the state issues a campaign · note names, office and party are copied from the filing; only the capitalisation is ours
01
What the campaign raised and spent
Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.
$38,196
raised
$37,761
spent
$435
cash on hand
As of the most recent report, not today.
149
contributors
$256
average contribution
Total divided by reported contributors.
Source Washington Public Disclosure Commission, candidate C-3 contribution and C-4 expenditure filings · as of 2026-09-12 · contributors 149 reported · note independent expenditures are filed by the spending committee, are not in these figures, and are in section 04 · how candidate money is tracked
02
Largest reported contributors
Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.
| Contributor | Amount | City | Employer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jenna Jotika Nand | $6,571 | ||
| Jenna Nand | $5,038 | ||
| WA Education Assn | $1,200 | Federal Way | |
| Lee Ian | $1,200 | Sylvania | Otfa |
| Brown Elizabeth | $1,200 | Shoreline | |
| Jenna Jotika Nand (Jenna Nand) | $800 | Lynnwood | |
| Beniwal Vijay | $500 | Bellevue | |
| Somers Dave | $400 | Monroe | Snohomish Coiunty |
| Employer stated by contributors | Contributors | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| puget sound naval shu | 1 | $1,200 |
| Today's Realty | 1 | $1,200 |
| Greenberg Traurig LLP | 1 | $1,200 |
| Meena Pallipamu | 1 | $1,000 |
| Hedera foundation | 1 | $1,000 |
| Therapeutics | 1 | $950 |
| DOC | 1 | $800 |
| Therapeutics and Otfa | 1 | $550 |
| No employer stated | 3 | $3,600 |
Why some contributors are not named. Private individuals are not named on this site unless their own public conduct — holding or seeking office, running an agency, or testifying to the legislature — already makes them a public figure. Their giving is shown here aggregated by the employer they stated. The full itemised record is public at the PDC.
2 of 8 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.
Last checked 2026-09-12
Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-09-12 · 8 named, 9 aggregated
03
Where the money went
Largest reported expenditures. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.
| Vendor | Amount | Category as filed |
|---|---|---|
| Terra Firma Consulting | $10,375 | Management and consulting services,Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc. |
| Break Blue Strategies | $9,342 | Management and consulting services,Campaign merchandise/paraphernalia,Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc. ,Design/graphic art, etc.,Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc. |
| Jenna Jotika Nand | $6,571 | Inkind contribution |
| Jenna Nand | $5,038 | Inkind contribution |
| Impact Public Affairs | $3,180 | Management and consulting services |
| Lo Andy | $1,225 | Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc. |
| Miller's Rent-All | $634 | Fundraising events and related costs |
Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-09-12 · top 7 shown
04
Money spent about this candidate by others
Independent expenditures and electioneering communications — money spent about this candidate by committees that are barred by law from coordinating with the campaign. It is not the candidate’s money and is not in the figures above. Spending for a candidate is not money from the candidate, and spending for and against are two facts, shown as two figures.
No independent expenditure or electioneering communication in the PDC feed names this candidate. That is what the feed held when the record was last read. It is not a finding that none was made: C-6 reports are filed within days of the spending, and the record is re-read on a schedule.
Last checked 2026-09-12
Source Public Disclosure Commission, C-6 independent expenditure and electioneering communication reports naming this candidate · as of 2026-09-12 · key the candidate the spender named on the C-6, matched by PDC candidate id · caveat for and against are not netted
05
What this page will not compute
A candidate page is where a reader expects a verdict about the person. Each of these is a verdict the filings do not support.
- No prediction.
- Money is not a forecast. The better-funded candidate frequently loses, and this page shows who paid for a campaign, not who will win.
- No net money.
- Spending for and spending against a candidate are two facts. Subtracting one from the other manufactures a third that nobody reported.
- No donor we cannot name by rule.
- A private individual is named only when their own public conduct clears them; everyone else is aggregated by employer. The rule is applied at sync and again at render, and no page relaxes it.
- No connected-records section.
- A candidate is not a node in the entity graph. Their money is on their committee’s filings, which is where the record lives; this page is a reading of those filings, not a second record.
- No record of office.
- What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages. Where this person also holds office, the methodology links their record.
06
Common questions
- What office is Jenna Nand running for?
- State Representative, as filed with the Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle.
- How much has Jenna Nand raised?
- $38,196 reported raised and $37,761 reported spent, from 149 reported contributors, as of the last filing we read. Figures change as reports are filed and amended.
- What party is Jenna Nand?
- The filing states “DEMOCRATIC”. Washington ballots carry a party preference, not a membership, and this page says only what the filing says.
- Who is spending money about Jenna Nand?
- Independent expenditures and electioneering communications total $0 supporting and $0 opposing, as two separate figures. The spenders are filed on the C-6 and are named in section 04 where the sync has carried them.
Answers are generated from the same filing fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.
Cite this page
This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.
“Jenna Jotika Nand (Jenna Nand),” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-12, accessed 2026-09-23. https://washingtonindependents.org/candidate/jenna-jotika-nand-jenna-nand/
The original filing at the PDCJSON endpointReport a correction
Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.
07
Where this page comes from
Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.
- A filing, not a live balance
- campaigns report on a schedule and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record (2026-09-12), and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.
- Identity
- the PDC filer id (NANDJ 037) — the one identifier the state issues a campaign. Two candidates sharing a name are two filer ids and two pages.
- Money
- C-3 contributions and C-4 expenditures reported by the campaign, 2026 cycle. Contributors are named only where the donor-naming rule clears them; the rest are aggregated by employer.
- Outside money
- C-6 independent expenditures and electioneering communications naming the candidate, by the spender’s filed stance. For and against are never netted.
- Not a record of office
- what someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages.