Candidate · PDC filing · 2026 cycle · filer GOODR 033

Roger Goodman

Roger Goodman is running for State Representative in Leg District 45 – House in 2026. This page is the campaign’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission: what it raised, who gave it, where it went, and what others spent about the candidate. It is not a record of holding office; that is a different page.

No party listedState RepresentativeLeg District 45 – House
Office, as filed
STATE REPRESENTATIVE · LEG DISTRICT 45 – HOUSE
Party preference
none stated

Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings (C-1) and reports (C-3, C-4) · as of 2026-09-12 · key PDC filer id — the one identifier the state issues a campaign · note names, office and party are copied from the filing; only the capitalisation is ours

01

What the campaign raised and spent

Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.

$31,429

raised

$43,768

spent

$-12,339

cash on hand

As of the most recent report, not today.

41

contributors

$767

average contribution

Total divided by reported contributors.

Source Washington Public Disclosure Commission, candidate C-3 contribution and C-4 expenditure filings · as of 2026-09-12 · contributors 41 reported · note independent expenditures are filed by the spending committee, are not in these figures, and are in section 04 · how candidate money is tracked

02

Largest reported contributors

Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.

Largest reported contributors to this campaign
Contributor Amount City Employer
BNSF $2,400 Fort Worth
Council of Police Political Support $2,400 Olympia
Washington Education Association (WEA) PAC $1,200 Federal Way
Triton Management Services LLC $1,200 Carlsbad
Credit Union Legislative Action Fund $1,200 Seatac
Amazon.com $1,200 Seattle
Puyallup Tribe of Indians $1,200 Tacoma
T-Mobile $1,200 Bellevue
Troy Nichols $1,200 Olympia Nichols Group Government Relations
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES $1,200 Richmond
Washington Beer and Wine Distributors Assn $1,200 Olympia
Washington Beverage Association PAC $1,200 Olympia
Lumen Technologies Service Group LLC $1,200 Monroe
SEIU Healthcare 1199NW $1,200 Renton
Washington Society of CPAs PAC $1,200 Bellevue
Puget Sound Pilots PAC $1,200 Seattle
Justice for All PAC $1,200 Seattle
DaVita $1,000 Federal Way
StateFarm $600 Bloomington
Individual contributors, grouped by stated employer
Employer stated by contributors Contributors Amount
No employer stated 1 $1,200

Why some contributors are not named. Private individuals are not named on this site unless their own public conduct — holding or seeking office, running an agency, or testifying to the legislature — already makes them a public figure. Their giving is shown here aggregated by the employer they stated. The full itemised record is public at the PDC.

1 of 19 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-09-12

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-09-12 · 19 named, 1 aggregated

03

Where the money went

Largest reported expenditures. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.

Largest reported expenditures by this campaign
Vendor Amount Category as filed
Friends of Roger Goodman Surplus Account $37,000 Transfer to surplus funds account
NGP VAN $5,435 Computers, printers, software, phones, etc.
Thomas P Conlon $677 Filing fees
Matthew Loschen $410 Inkind contribution
Act Blue $128 Bank and payment processing charges
House Democratic Campaign Committee / HDCC $109 Inkind contribution
Washington State Department of Labor and Industries $10 Utilities, phone, and other overhead costs

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-09-12 · top 7 shown

04

Money spent about this candidate by others

Independent expenditures and electioneering communications — money spent about this candidate by committees that are barred by law from coordinating with the campaign. It is not the candidate’s money and is not in the figures above. Spending for a candidate is not money from the candidate, and spending for and against are two facts, shown as two figures.

  1. Spent supporting

    stance filed as “for”

    $160
  2. Spent opposing

    stance filed as “against” · not subtracted from the row above

    none filed
  • Fuse Votes for · $160

Source Public Disclosure Commission, C-6 independent expenditure and electioneering communication reports naming this candidate · as of 2026-09-12 · scale $160 = full width · key the candidate the spender named on the C-6, matched by PDC candidate id · caveat for and against are not netted

05

What this page will not compute

A candidate page is where a reader expects a verdict about the person. Each of these is a verdict the filings do not support.

No prediction.
Money is not a forecast. The better-funded candidate frequently loses, and this page shows who paid for a campaign, not who will win.
No net money.
Spending for and spending against a candidate are two facts. Subtracting one from the other manufactures a third that nobody reported.
No donor we cannot name by rule.
A private individual is named only when their own public conduct clears them; everyone else is aggregated by employer. The rule is applied at sync and again at render, and no page relaxes it.
No connected-records section.
A candidate is not a node in the entity graph. Their money is on their committee’s filings, which is where the record lives; this page is a reading of those filings, not a second record.
No record of office.
What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages. Where this person also holds office, the methodology links their record.

06

Common questions

What office is Roger Goodman running for?
State Representative, as filed with the Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle.
How much has Roger Goodman raised?
$31,429 reported raised and $43,768 reported spent, from 41 reported contributors, as of the last filing we read. Figures change as reports are filed and amended.
What party is Roger Goodman?
The filing states no party preference.
Who is spending money about Roger Goodman?
Independent expenditures and electioneering communications total $160 supporting and $0 opposing, as two separate figures. The spenders are filed on the C-6 and are named in section 04 where the sync has carried them.

Answers are generated from the same filing fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Roger Goodman,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-12, accessed 2026-09-23. https://washingtonindependents.org/candidate/roger-goodman/

The original filing at the PDCJSON endpointReport a correction

Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.

07

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

A filing, not a live balance
campaigns report on a schedule and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record (2026-09-12), and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.
Identity
the PDC filer id (GOODR 033) — the one identifier the state issues a campaign. Two candidates sharing a name are two filer ids and two pages.
Money
C-3 contributions and C-4 expenditures reported by the campaign, 2026 cycle. Contributors are named only where the donor-naming rule clears them; the rest are aggregated by employer.
Outside money
C-6 independent expenditures and electioneering communications naming the candidate, by the spender’s filed stance. For and against are never netted.
Not a record of office
what someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages.