HB 1355 — Tax compacts/capital invest.

HB 1355 was introduced in the 2025-26 Washington legislative session by Representative Berg. It became law.

  • 2025-26 session
  • House
  • Became law
  • 1 public hearing
  • Sponsor: Berg

Source Washington State Legislature web services: legislation, hearings and roll calls · as of 2026-09-09 · introduced 2025-01-17

01

Where it stopped

Became law

Last recorded action
Effective date 7/27/2025.
Session law
C 136 L 25 — chapter and year in the session laws
Last committee
Senate Ways & Means — the last committee with this bill on an agenda
Public hearing
Yes — 1 on record — a public hearing is where testimony is taken; an executive session is where a committee votes

Source WA Legislature bill history — every row links to the chamber record that establishes it · as of 2026-09-09 · how a stop point is read

02

What it would do

The Legislature’s own description. We do not paraphrase legislation.

Modifying retail taxes compacts between the state of Washington and federally recognized tribes located in Washington state by increasing the revenue-sharing percentages when a compacting tribe has completed a qualified capital investment.

Legal title AN ACT Relating to modifying retail taxes compacts between the state of Washington and federally recognized tribes located in Washington state by increasing the revenue-sharing percentages when a compacting tribe has completed a qualified capital investment;

Source WA Legislature bill digest and text, quoted whole · as of 2026-09-09 · edits none — we write no summary of our own

03

The votes

Recorded floor votes. Committee votes are in the hearing record below.

HOUSE · 2025-03-20

3rd Reading & Final Passage

71

yea

24

nay

3

absent or excused

3rd Reading & Final Passage, House — vote by caucus
Caucus Yea Nay Absent or excused Members voting
DDemocratic 57 0 2 59
RRepublican 14 24 1 39
Total 71 24 3 98

98 of 98 seats recorded — the columns add to the chamber.

Members who voted against their caucus majority

Listed because they are the part of the roll call a party-line summary hides. Crossing a caucus is a description of this vote, not a virtue or a betrayal, and we attach no label to it.

  • RRepublican Abbarno LD 20 YEA
  • RRepublican Barkis LD 2 YEA
  • RRepublican Chase LD 4 YEA
  • RRepublican Couture LD 35 YEA
  • RRepublican Griffey LD 35 YEA
  • RRepublican Klicker LD 16 YEA
  • RRepublican Ley LD 18 YEA
  • RRepublican Marshall LD 2 YEA
  • RRepublican McEntire LD 19 YEA
  • RRepublican Rude LD 16 YEA
  • RRepublican Valdez LD 26 YEA
  • RRepublican Walsh LD 19 YEA
  • RRepublican Waters LD 17 YEA
  • RRepublican Ybarra LD 13 YEA

Full roll call, every member by name

HOUSE · 2025-03-20

Final Passage on Reconsideration

72

yea

23

nay

3

absent or excused

Final Passage on Reconsideration, House — vote by caucus
Caucus Yea Nay Absent or excused Members voting
DDemocratic 57 0 2 59
RRepublican 15 23 1 39
Total 72 23 3 98

98 of 98 seats recorded — the columns add to the chamber.

Members who voted against their caucus majority

Listed because they are the part of the roll call a party-line summary hides. Crossing a caucus is a description of this vote, not a virtue or a betrayal, and we attach no label to it.

  • RRepublican Abbarno LD 20 YEA
  • RRepublican Barkis LD 2 YEA
  • RRepublican Chase LD 4 YEA
  • RRepublican Couture LD 35 YEA
  • RRepublican Griffey LD 35 YEA
  • RRepublican Klicker LD 16 YEA
  • RRepublican Ley LD 18 YEA
  • RRepublican Marshall LD 2 YEA
  • RRepublican McEntire LD 19 YEA
  • RRepublican Rude LD 16 YEA
  • RRepublican Stokesbary LD 31 YEA
  • RRepublican Valdez LD 26 YEA
  • RRepublican Walsh LD 19 YEA
  • RRepublican Waters LD 17 YEA
  • RRepublican Ybarra LD 13 YEA

Full roll call, every member by name

SENATE · 2025-04-09

3rd Reading & Final Passage

40

yea

8

nay

1

absent or excused

3rd Reading & Final Passage, Senate — vote by caucus
Caucus Yea Nay Absent or excused Members voting
DDemocratic 30 0 0 30
RRepublican 10 8 1 19
Total 40 8 1 49

49 of 49 seats recorded — the columns add to the chamber.

Members who voted against their caucus majority

Listed because they are the part of the roll call a party-line summary hides. Crossing a caucus is a description of this vote, not a virtue or a betrayal, and we attach no label to it.

  • RRepublican Boehnke LD 8 NAY
  • RRepublican Christian LD 4 NAY
  • RRepublican Dozier LD 16 NAY
  • RRepublican MacEwen LD 35 NAY
  • RRepublican Schoesler LD 9 NAY
  • RRepublican Short LD 7 NAY
  • RRepublican Warnick LD 13 NAY
  • RRepublican Wilson, J. LD 19 NAY

Full roll call, every member by name

Sources WA Legislature roll-call archive (floor); chamber roster for party · as of 2026-09-09 · rows 3 recorded votes · key member id printed on the roll call, joined to the chamber roster — never a surname · seats the denominator is the constitutional chamber, 98 House and 49 Senate, not our roster · note committee votes are published as sign-off sheets, not roll calls, and are not counted here

04

Sponsors

Who put their name to the bill. The Legislature records a prime sponsor on the bill status; the full co-sponsor roster appears only in the introduced bill text, which we have not ingested.

Prime sponsor

Berg

as printed the sponsor line on the bill status record · introduced in the House. A committee substitute prints the committee here, with the originating member in parentheses.

The co-sponsor roster is not on this page. We hold the prime sponsor the Legislature prints on the bill status, not the list of co-sponsors, which is published only in the introduced bill text we have not ingested. A co-sponsor count here would be a number no record we hold contains.

Source WA Legislature legislation service · as of 2026-09-09

05

The hearing record

Every committee meeting where this bill appeared on the agenda. Public is where testimony is taken; Executive is where the committee votes. Anyone may register a position on a bill before its hearing without speaking. Those sign-ins are a public record of who showed up — they are not a poll, not a sample of the state, and not a measure of public opinion. They count the people who knew the hearing was happening.

Committee hearing record
Date Type Committee Chamber
2025-01-30 Public House Finance House
2025-02-04 Executive House Finance House
2025-04-03 Executive Senate Ways & Means Senate

House Finance, public hearing · 2025-01-30

Con 14
Pro 17
Other 0

31 sign-ins · 6 testified in person · bars share one scale, longest = 17

Source WA Legislature committee hearing records and committee sign-in (CSI) sheets · as of 2026-09-09 · rows 1 public, 2 executive · sign-ins 31, counted per hearing from the committee sign-in sheets; names are on the sheet and are not published · note a sign-in is a position registered before the hearing, in person or online; it is not testimony and not a vote · how hearings are read

06

What changed between versions

Only one version on file. The bill was never substituted or engrossed, or the legislation service returns only the surviving version for this session — for completed biennia it usually returns the latter.

Last checked 2026-09-09

07 · component 08

Connected records

Everything below is a link some document draws for us. Nothing here is our inference. Grouped by how well the record supports it, always in this order, never sorted by interest.

On the record · 1

One document states the relation in its own words.

Nothing on file

Votes are in the graph but render as roll-call tables above, not as rows here. Hearings, referrals and companion bills are not in the graph yet. No lobbying registration names this bill in the graph: the L-2 bill lines are not loaded, which is not the same as no lobbying having occurred.

Checked 2026-09-09

Source one query on the edge table, grouped by tier · as of 2026-09-09 · edges 1 filed, 0 composite, 0 adjacency · how edges are built

08

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

Who killed it
We can say a bill was never scheduled for a public hearing. We cannot say who decided that. Chairs control agendas, but the record does not attribute a non-decision to a person, and we will not infer one from a committee roster.
Why it died
Withdrawn, superseded by its own companion, folded into a budget, or simply never taken up — all four look identical in the data.
Whether lobbying affected it
Washington collects lobbyist compensation and employer registrations, and the summary feed we hold of them carries no bill column — checked against lobbyist_compensation and lobbyist_reporting, neither of which has one. So we hold no documented link between a lobbying report and a bill number and publish none. That is a limit of the extract, not a claim that no filing anywhere names a bill: reading the L-2 report body is what it would take to find out.
What changed between versions
We hold the version list, not the text of each version.
How a member would have voted
Only recorded votes appear here. A member absent from a roll call is recorded as absent, not as opposed.
Sign-ins as public opinion
A hearing sign-in sheet counts the people who knew the hearing was happening and could reach it. It is a public record of who showed up, not a poll, not a sample of the state, and not a measure of what Washington thinks. A bill with more sign-ins against it than for it has not been voted down by the public.
An importance score
No ranking of this bill against others, no “major legislation” badge, no prediction of what it will do next. Every bill gets the same page whether it passed, died, or was never heard, and there is no editorial selection of which bills receive one.

09

Common questions

What happened to HB 1355?
HB 1355 became law. The Legislature’s status record places it at “C 136 L 25” — its chapter and year in the session laws.
Who sponsored HB 1355?
The prime sponsor of record is Berg, as printed on the bill status. This page does not list co-sponsors — that roster is published only in the introduced bill text, which we have not ingested.
What would HB 1355 do?
In the Legislature’s own description: “Modifying retail taxes compacts between the state of Washington and federally recognized tribes located in Washington state by increasing the revenue-sharing percentages when a compacting tribe has completed a qualified capital investment.” We quote the official language rather than summarising, because a paraphrase of legislation is an interpretation.
Was there a recorded vote on HB 1355?
Yes. 3 recorded floor votes appear on this page, member counts and all. Committee votes are held separately as scanned sign-off sheets and are not counted here.
Did HB 1355 get a public hearing?
Yes — 1 public hearing is on record. A public hearing is where testimony is taken; it is not the committee vote, which happens in an executive session.

Answers are generated from the same fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“HB 1355 — Tax compacts/capital invest.,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-09, accessed 2026-09-19. https://washingtonindependents.org/bill/2025-26-hb-1355/

JSON endpointReport a correction

Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.

10

How this page is built

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

WA Legislature legislation service
Bill id, titles, sponsor, introduced date, and the history line and location code we render as its status.
WA Legislature committee hearing records
Every committee agenda this bill appeared on, and whether each was a public hearing or an executive session.
WA Legislature roll call service
Recorded floor votes, member by member.
Outcome
Derived, not published by the Legislature. Enacted means a chapter number or effective date is on record; died is only ever assigned once a session has ended; a sitting session yields pending and no death is asserted.
Not loaded
Bill text, amendments, committee votes as individual member records, testimony, and fiscal notes.