Reedy Berg
Reedy Berg is running for STATE REPRESENTATIVE, District 15 in LEG DISTRICT 15 – HOUSE in 2026.
Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings · as of 2026-07-28
01
What the campaign raised and spent
Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.
$6,939
raised
$4,104
spent
$2,835
cash on hand
As of the most recent report, not today.
15
contributors
$463
average contribution
Total divided by reported contributors.
Spent by other people
Independent expenditures — money spent by committees, parties or unions advocating for or against this candidate. It is not the candidate’s money and is not included above. By law it is spent without coordinating with the campaign, so it is neither a favour accepted nor an attack invited.
| Position | Reported |
|---|---|
| Supporting this candidate | $0 |
| Opposing this candidate | $0 |
This does not say who spent it. The totals come from the candidate’s own record. Which committees spent the money, and on what, is filed separately by those committees — we hold that data but have not yet joined it to this page.
Last checked 2026-07-28
02
Largest reported contributors
Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.
| Contributor | Amount | City | Employer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plath Rick | $1,200 | Yakima | Washington Fruit |
| Powers Burton | $1,199 | Graham | retired |
| Kennedy Tom | $1,000 | Yakima | Orthopedics Northwest |
| bonny Lyle | $1,000 | Yakima | retired |
| Morris Evan | $500 | Mercer Island | Self Employed |
| Berg Ryan R | $500 | Granite Falls | Patterson Dental |
| Ehlers Jonathan | $500 | Yakima | Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices |
| Marquis Trent | $200 | Yakima | |
| Rich Douglas | $200 | Yakima | |
| Baker Sarah | $200 | Yakima | |
| Reedy Berg | $100 | Yakima |
7 of 11 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.
Last checked 2026-07-28
Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-07-28 · top 11 shown
03
Where the money went
Largest reported expenditures. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.
| Vendor | Amount | Category as filed |
|---|---|---|
| SPD & G Advertising | $2,493 | Design/graphic art, etc. |
| Vista Print | $791 | Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc. |
| EXPENSES OF $200.00 OR LESS | $422 | |
| L2 | $397 | Other |
Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-07-28 · top 4 shown
04
Where this page comes from
Every figure above is read from the candidate’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission. Nothing here is estimated, modelled or inferred.
This is a filing, not a live balance. Campaigns report on a schedule, and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record — 2026-07-28, and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.
Money is not a prediction. The better-funded candidate frequently loses. This page shows who paid for a campaign; it does not show who won, and it makes no claim about either.
A candidate is not the same record as an officeholder. What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions, kept on separate pages. See their voting record.
Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings, 2026 cycle · as of 2026-07-28 · filer BERGR–992
The original filing at the PDC
Something wrong here? corrections@washingtonindependents.org · how corrections work