Candidate · PDC filing · 2026 cycle · filer AMAMS–327
Sharonda Amamilo
Sharonda Amamilo is running for State Supreme Court Justice in 2026. This page is the campaign’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission: what it raised, who gave it, where it went, and what others spent about the candidate. It is not a record of holding office; that is a different page.
- Filed as
- Sharonda D Amamilo
- Office, as filed
- STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE · SUPREME COURT
- Party preference
- none stated
Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings (C-1) and reports (C-3, C-4) · as of 2026-09-12 · key PDC filer id — the one identifier the state issues a campaign · note names, office and party are copied from the filing; only the capitalisation is ours
01
What the campaign raised and spent
Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.
$77,401
raised
$93,421
spent
$-16,020
cash on hand
As of the most recent report, not today.
202
contributors
$383
average contribution
Total divided by reported contributors.
Source Washington Public Disclosure Commission, candidate C-3 contribution and C-4 expenditure filings · as of 2026-09-12 · contributors 202 reported · note independent expenditures are filed by the spending committee, are not in these figures, and are in section 04 · how candidate money is tracked
02
Largest reported contributors
Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.
| Contributor | Amount | City | Employer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharonda D Amamilo | $16,348 | ||
| Kauffman Jonathan | $2,400 | Seattle | |
| Watson Amelia | $1,550 | Olympia | |
| Fraser Karen | $1,000 | Olympia |
| Employer stated by contributors | Contributors | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Budd Bay Law PS | 1 | $2,400 |
| University of Washington | 1 | $2,400 |
| Desmond Law Group, P.S. | 1 | $2,400 |
| VIVEK Environmental Engineers, LLC | 1 | $1,200 |
| Real Experts Realty | 1 | $1,200 |
| St. Regis | 1 | $1,000 |
| Bright Engineering, Inc. | 1 | $800 |
| No employer stated | 8 | $12,701 |
Why some contributors are not named. Private individuals are not named on this site unless their own public conduct — holding or seeking office, running an agency, or testifying to the legislature — already makes them a public figure. Their giving is shown here aggregated by the employer they stated. The full itemised record is public at the PDC.
0 of 4 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.
Last checked 2026-09-12
Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-09-12 · 4 named, 8 aggregated
03
Where the money went
Largest reported expenditures. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.
| Vendor | Amount | Category as filed |
|---|---|---|
| Break Blue Strategies | $64,189 | Digital advertising,Fundraising events and related costs,Newspaper/periodical advertising,Management and consulting services |
| Sharonda D Amamilo | $16,348 | Inkind contribution |
| Capitol City Press | $6,407 | Printing campaign signs,Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc. |
| Anedot | $2,350 | Bank and payment processing charges |
| Morann Terri | $1,200 | Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc. |
| SWITCHBOARD PUBLIC BENEFIT CORP | $1,073 | Digital advertising |
| Bright Ade | $800 | Inkind contribution |
| Intuit Mailchimp | $627 | Digital advertising |
| Campaign Verify | $190 | Digital advertising |
| WSECU | $25 | Bank and payment processing charges |
| Yu Mary | $23 | Inkind contribution |
| M Seigel Elliot | $0 | Contribution Refunds |
| Pilon Eric | $0 | Contribution Refunds |
Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-09-12 · top 13 shown
04
Money spent about this candidate by others
Independent expenditures and electioneering communications — money spent about this candidate by committees that are barred by law from coordinating with the campaign. It is not the candidate’s money and is not in the figures above. Spending for a candidate is not money from the candidate, and spending for and against are two facts, shown as two figures.
- Fuse Votes
- Beware the Attack on Our Courts
Source Public Disclosure Commission, C-6 independent expenditure and electioneering communication reports naming this candidate · as of 2026-09-12 · scale $13,272 = full width · key the candidate the spender named on the C-6, matched by PDC candidate id · caveat for and against are not netted
05
What this page will not compute
A candidate page is where a reader expects a verdict about the person. Each of these is a verdict the filings do not support.
- No prediction.
- Money is not a forecast. The better-funded candidate frequently loses, and this page shows who paid for a campaign, not who will win.
- No net money.
- Spending for and spending against a candidate are two facts. Subtracting one from the other manufactures a third that nobody reported.
- No donor we cannot name by rule.
- A private individual is named only when their own public conduct clears them; everyone else is aggregated by employer. The rule is applied at sync and again at render, and no page relaxes it.
- No connected-records section.
- A candidate is not a node in the entity graph. Their money is on their committee’s filings, which is where the record lives; this page is a reading of those filings, not a second record.
- No record of office.
- What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages. Where this person also holds office, the methodology links their record.
06
Common questions
- What office is Sharonda Amamilo running for?
- State Supreme Court Justice, as filed with the Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle.
- How much has Sharonda Amamilo raised?
- $77,401 reported raised and $93,421 reported spent, from 202 reported contributors, as of the last filing we read. Figures change as reports are filed and amended.
- What party is Sharonda Amamilo?
- The filing states no party preference.
- Who is spending money about Sharonda Amamilo?
- Independent expenditures and electioneering communications total $13,272 supporting and $0 opposing, as two separate figures. The spenders are filed on the C-6 and are named in section 04 where the sync has carried them.
Answers are generated from the same filing fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.
Cite this page
This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.
“Sharonda D Amamilo (Sharonda Amamilo),” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-12, accessed 2026-09-23. https://washingtonindependents.org/candidate/sharonda-d-amamilo-sharonda-amamilo/
The original filing at the PDCJSON endpointReport a correction
Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.
07
Where this page comes from
Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.
- A filing, not a live balance
- campaigns report on a schedule and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record (2026-09-12), and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.
- Identity
- the PDC filer id (AMAMS–327) — the one identifier the state issues a campaign. Two candidates sharing a name are two filer ids and two pages.
- Money
- C-3 contributions and C-4 expenditures reported by the campaign, 2026 cycle. Contributors are named only where the donor-naming rule clears them; the rest are aggregated by employer.
- Outside money
- C-6 independent expenditures and electioneering communications naming the candidate, by the spender’s filed stance. For and against are never netted.
- Not a record of office
- what someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages.