Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood)

Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) is a political committee registered with the Washington Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle. It reported $3,311,722 from 990 contributors. It registered for Proposition IL26-001, IL26-638, IL26-645.

  • 2026 cycle
  • Political Committee
  • PDC ID 30644
  • Proposition IL26-001, IL26-638, IL26-645
  • For
  • $3.3M raised · 2026
  • $3.0M spent · 2026
  • 990 contributors

$3.3M

raised

$3.0M

spent

$3,345

average contribution

The total divided by the reported contributor count.

Registration

type
Political Committee · 2026 cycle
treasurer
Named on the C-1 registration, which is not in the extract we hold — it is in the PDC filings linked above.

A political committee is not a legislative committee. For the four kinds of committee on file and why they are never ranked together, see the committee directory.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

01

Money in — who funds this committee

The largest reported contributions. Washington requires committees to itemise contributions above a threshold; smaller gifts are reported in aggregate.

Largest reported contributors
Contributor City Amount
HEYWOOD BRIAN Redmond $606,335
Hughes Lawrence Medina $250,000
GORDON STEVE Lake Tapps $250,000
Crow Robert Medina $245,000
Kelley DevCom LLC Bellevue $200,000
SMALL CONTRIBUTIONS $125,215
Gordon Larry Lake Tapps $125,000
Gordon Virginia Lake Tapps $125,000
Schlaepfer Phil Greenland Village $100,000
Kemper Holdings LLC Bellevue $100,000
Abraham Zach Gig Harbor $50,000
Plath Peter Yakima $35,000
McKinley Sands Lakewood $32,000
Hermanson Richard Lake Tapps $31,000
Dussault Michael Fall City $25,275
Bundrant Diane Edmonds $25,000
Bundrant Joe Seattle $25,000
Desert Bloom Residence LLC Seattle $25,000
Rowley Properties, Inc. Issaquah $25,000
BIAW Member Services Corporation Tumwater $25,000

Contributions are not broken down by size, and employers are not named. Washington collects an employer field for individual contributions, and gift-size banding is what separates a committee funded by a hundred neighbours from one funded by three donors. We store only the largest contributors, so neither analysis is possible here — and computing concentration from a top-ten list would produce a confident number that is simply wrong.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28 · $2,424,825 of $3,311,722 shown across 20 of 990 contributors

02

How the money was gathered

The PDC types every contributor. This does not follow a committee’s own money back to a person — see what this page does not show — but it does say how much arrived from individuals rather than from other organisations.

Contributions by contributor type
Contributor type Amount Share Gifts
Individual $2,676,655 84% 776
Business $508,200 16% 18
Other $243 0% 7
Party $200 0% 1

Contributions below the itemisation threshold are not broken out here. Washington lets small gifts be reported as a single total with no contributor named. The mix above therefore covers itemised money; the small-dollar total it leaves out is inside the amount raised and cannot be split by anyone, including the PDC.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28

03

Employers behind the individual gifts

The employer of each individual contribution, as self-reported by the contributor. A company named here did not give and did not report — the string is the donor’s, normalised by us.

Colleagues who gave on the same day

Three or more people sharing an employer, giving to this committee on a single date. Money arriving together is the pattern; a shared employer on its own is not.

No same-day bundles were detected for this committee. No date shows three or more contributors sharing a stated employer giving together. That is what the filings hold, not proof no coordinated giving happened — the employer field below is blank on most gifts, so a bundle whose donors left it empty would not appear.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Employers behind more than one donor

Across the whole cycle rather than a single day. Weaker than the table above, and included because a slow accumulation from one workplace is still worth being able to see.

Employers with more than one contributor
Employer Donors Total
Microsoft 2 $17,150
Harnish Auto Family 2 $3,500
Google 2 $1,250

Only 13.6% of itemised donors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor and left blank more often than not, so both tables above show what we can see rather than everything that exists. Treat the counts as a floor. Occupations reported in the employer box — “retired”, “self-employed” — are excluded, because they are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source WA PDC C3 contributions, employer field as self-reported by contributors · as of 2026-07-28

04

How concentrated the money is

Computed from every itemised contribution rather than from the largest few, which is what makes the share meaningful.

64.4%

from the top 10 donors

Out of 990 itemised contributors in total.

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28

05

Money out — where it went

$3.0M

total spent

90.7%

of what it raised

Spending as a share of contributions received.

15

largest payees listed

Who it paid

Largest payees, with the category the committee chose when filing. A consultancy, printer or polling firm appearing across many committees is a fact about who runs campaigns in Washington.

Largest payees reported by this committee
Payee Amount Payments Category as filed
CollectiveVoice Solutions $1,957,112 14 Voter signature/petition gathering costs
Pixelpure Media $189,819 15 Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc.
American Printing $86,145 1 Postage costs, mail permits, purchase of stamps
Western Dawn LLC $68,129 12 Management and consulting services
Palmer Kelly $55,325 13 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Voter Science $43,828 8 Management and consulting services
Herzberg Hallie $41,310 12 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Ballard Spahr $40,578 6 Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc.
Ragnar Research Partners LLC $36,400 1 Surveys, polling, research costs
Paychex $33,445 25 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Butenschoen Ashley $31,029 13 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Johnson Josh $29,965 8 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Carlile Camille $27,360 12 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Skillman Don $24,000 2 Inkind contribution
Ard Law Group PLLC $22,634 2 Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc.

A further $5,659 was reported as small expenses. Washington lets a committee report spending below a threshold as a single lump with no payee. That money is in the total above and cannot be broken out by anyone, including us.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings · as of 2026-07-28

06

Independent expenditures by party

Money this committee reported spending for or against someone without coordinating with them. Kept apart from its ordinary spending, because folding the two together would misstate both.

No independent expenditures are on file for this committee this cycle. Most committees never make one — independent spending is concentrated in a few hundred filers. An empty section here is the PDC record, not a gap in ours.

Last checked 2026-07-28

07

When the money moved

Itemised contributions in and expenditures out, by the month on the filing. Unitemised small-dollar totals carry no dates and are not in this chart — the money-in section states them.

Monthly money in and out for Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood); bars are scaled to the largest month, $1.3M
Month In   Out  
May 2024 $6,225
Jun 2024
Jul 2024
Aug 2024
Sep 2024
Oct 2024
Nov 2024
Dec 2024
Jan 2025
Feb 2025
Mar 2025
Apr 2025
May 2025
Jun 2025
Jul 2025
Aug 2025
Sep 2025
Oct 2025
Nov 2025
Dec 2025
Jan 2026 $217K $207K
Feb 2026 $96,365 $116K
Mar 2026 $107K $153K
Apr 2026 $114K $111K
May 2026 $997K $1.2M
Jun 2026 $1.3M $1.2M
Jul 2026 $488K

Source WA PDC contribution and expenditure schedules, transaction dates as filed · as of 2026-07-28 · bars scaled to the largest month, $1.3M

08

Across cycles

Other filings under the same PDC committee id.

Only one cycle on file. We hold a single filing for committee 30644. That means it registered for one election, or that our sync covers only the cycles this one falls in — the filings do not distinguish the two.

Last checked 2026-07-28

09

Does it add up

The arithmetic, in the open. Reported contributions less reported spending is what the committee should still be holding.

Reported contributions $3,311,722
Reported expenditures − $3,003,154
Implied balance $308,567

This is what the two filings imply, not a bank balance. Committees also report cash on hand directly, and the two figures can differ where a report is outstanding.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

10

What this page does not show

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

Who is really behind a committee that funds this one
We show every contributor the committee reported, and how much of its money came from organisations rather than individuals. A committee funded by another committee is common, and following that chain to the people at the end of it means joining filings across organisations and cycles — a join we have not made, and one that would be wrong to guess at.
Who the independent spending was aimed at
The filings name the candidate or measure each independent expenditure supported or opposed. We hold the amounts and which way they cut, but have not joined them to those records, so the page says how much and not against whom.
Whether the spending worked
We hold what was raised, what was spent, and in some cases the result. Connecting them would be a causal claim from two numbers, and spending is not the only thing that moves an election.
Anything below the itemisation threshold
Washington lets small contributions and small expenses be reported as lump sums with no counterparty. That money is in the totals and cannot be broken out by anyone, including the PDC. Where a lump is large, the page says so.

11

Common questions

What is Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood)?
Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) is a political committee registered with the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 election cycle.
How much money has Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) raised?
Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) reported $3,311,722 in contributions for the 2026 cycle from 990 contributors. The largest itemised contributions are listed in the money-in section above, and how that money was gathered is broken down by contributor type.
How much has Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) spent?
Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) reported $3,003,154 in expenditures. The “Does it add up” section subtracts reported spending from reported contributions in the open, and prints the residual even when the two filings do not yet reconcile.
Did Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) support or oppose a ballot measure?
Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) registered for Proposition IL26-001, IL26-638, IL26-645, according to its PDC registration.
Where does the data on Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) come from?
Every figure on this page is read from Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood)’s own filings with the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, published at the PDC. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a filing is silent or late, the page says so rather than filling the gap.
What is a political committee in Washington?
A political committee is any person or group, other than an individual, that raises or spends money to support or oppose a candidate or ballot measure in Washington. State law requires it to register with the Public Disclosure Commission and to file regular contribution and expenditure reports, which are the records this page is built from.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Let’s Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood),” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-07-28, accessed 2026-08-30. https://washingtonindependents.org/committee/let-s-go-washington-sponsored-by-brian-heywood/

12

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

Public Disclosure Commission committee filings
Registration, contribution and expenditure totals, and the largest reported contributors. The original record is at the PDC.
Not loaded
Itemised expenditures, contributor employers, gift-size banding, and independent expenditure filings. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.