What office is Jenne Alderks running for?

State Representative, as filed with the Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle.

How much has Jenne Alderks raised?

$13,738 reported raised and $16,025 reported spent, from 52 reported contributors, as of the last filing we read. Figures change as reports are filed and amended.

What party is Jenne Alderks?

The filing states “DEMOCRATIC”. Washington ballots carry a party preference, not a membership, and this page says only what the filing says.

Who is spending money about Jenne Alderks?

Independent expenditures and electioneering communications total $240 supporting and $0 opposing, as two separate figures. The spenders are filed on the C-6 and are named in section 04 where the sync has carried them.

Candidate · PDC filing · 2026 cycle · filer ALDEJ–041

Jenne Alderks

Jenne Alderks is running for State Representative in Leg District 01 – House in 2026. This page is the campaign’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission: what it raised, who gave it, where it went, and what others spent about the candidate. It is not a record of holding office; that is a different page.

DDemocraticState RepresentativeLeg District 01 – House

Office, as filed: STATE REPRESENTATIVE · LEG DISTRICT 01 – HOUSE
Party preference: as stated on the filing: DEMOCRATIC

Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings (C-1) and reports (C-3, C-4) · as of 2026-09-12 · key PDC filer id — the one identifier the state issues a campaign · note names, office and party are copied from the filing; only the capitalisation is ours

What the campaign raised and spent

Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.

$13,738

raised

$16,025

spent

$-2,287

cash on hand

As of the most recent report, not today.

contributors

$264

average contribution

Total divided by reported contributors.

Source Washington Public Disclosure Commission, candidate C-3 contribution and C-4 expenditure filings · as of 2026-09-12 · contributors 52 reported · note independent expenditures are filed by the spending committee, are not in these figures, and are in section 04 · how candidate money is tracked

Largest reported contributors

Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.

Largest reported contributors to this campaign
Contributor	Amount	City	Employer
Americans 4 Hindus WA	$1,000	San Rafael
425 Action	$900	Seattle
WA State Democrats	$800	Seattle
Jenne Alderks	$700	Bothell
Muenchow Holly	$500	Woodinville
Thompson Mason	$500	Bothell
Lipscomb Ruth	$500	Bellevue	Not Employed
Riddle Semra	$300	Seattle
Banaszynski Tracy	$300	Kenmore
UFCW 3000	$250	Des Moines
Jenne Alderks	$216

Individual contributors, grouped by stated employer
Employer stated by contributors	Contributors	Amount
Microsoft	1	$1,200
Washington & Washington	1	$1,000
Aurora	1	$500
Pagliacci	1	$300
No employer stated	4	$2,000

Why some contributors are not named. Private individuals are not named on this site unless their own public conduct — holding or seeking office, running an agency, or testifying to the legislature — already makes them a public figure. Their giving is shown here aggregated by the employer they stated. The full itemised record is public at the PDC.

1 of 11 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-09-12

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-09-12 · 11 named, 5 aggregated

Where the money went

Largest reported expenditures. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.

Largest reported expenditures by this campaign
Vendor	Amount	Category as filed
Break Blue Strategies	$12,071	Management and consulting services,Postage costs, mail permits, purchase of stamps,Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc. ,Design/graphic art, etc.,Printing campaign signs,Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
WA State Democrats	$1,830	Inkind contribution,Utilities, phone, and other overhead costs
Lo Andy	$735	Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc.
State of WA	$677	Filing fees
Jenne Alderks	$216	Inkind contribution
Evans Jason	$109	Inkind contribution
Goyal Manish	$0	Contribution Refunds

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-09-12 · top 7 shown

Money spent about this candidate by others

Independent expenditures and electioneering communications — money spent about this candidate by committees that are barred by law from coordinating with the campaign. It is not the candidate’s money and is not in the figures above. Spending for a candidate is not money from the candidate, and spending for and against are two facts, shown as two figures.

Spent supporting
stance filed as “for”
$240
Spent opposing
stance filed as “against” · not subtracted from the row above
none filed

Fuse Votes for · $240

Source Public Disclosure Commission, C-6 independent expenditure and electioneering communication reports naming this candidate · as of 2026-09-12 · scale $240 = full width · key the candidate the spender named on the C-6, matched by PDC candidate id · caveat for and against are not netted

What this page will not compute

A candidate page is where a reader expects a verdict about the person. Each of these is a verdict the filings do not support.

No prediction.: Money is not a forecast. The better-funded candidate frequently loses, and this page shows who paid for a campaign, not who will win.
No net money.: Spending for and spending against a candidate are two facts. Subtracting one from the other manufactures a third that nobody reported.
No donor we cannot name by rule.: A private individual is named only when their own public conduct clears them; everyone else is aggregated by employer. The rule is applied at sync and again at render, and no page relaxes it.
No connected-records section.: A candidate is not a node in the entity graph. Their money is on their committee’s filings, which is where the record lives; this page is a reading of those filings, not a second record.
No record of office.: What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages. Where this person also holds office, the methodology links their record.

Common questions

What office is Jenne Alderks running for?: State Representative, as filed with the Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle.
How much has Jenne Alderks raised?: $13,738 reported raised and $16,025 reported spent, from 52 reported contributors, as of the last filing we read. Figures change as reports are filed and amended.
What party is Jenne Alderks?: The filing states “DEMOCRATIC”. Washington ballots carry a party preference, not a membership, and this page says only what the filing says.
Who is spending money about Jenne Alderks?: Independent expenditures and electioneering communications total $240 supporting and $0 opposing, as two separate figures. The spenders are filed on the C-6 and are named in section 04 where the sync has carried them.

Answers are generated from the same filing fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Jenne Alderks,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-12, accessed 2026-09-20. https://washingtonindependents.org/candidate/jenne-alderks/

The original filing at the PDC JSON endpoint Report a correction

Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

A filing, not a live balance: campaigns report on a schedule and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record (2026-09-12), and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.
Identity: the PDC filer id (ALDEJ–041) — the one identifier the state issues a campaign. Two candidates sharing a name are two filer ids and two pages.
Money: C-3 contributions and C-4 expenditures reported by the campaign, 2026 cycle. Contributors are named only where the donor-naming rule clears them; the rest are aggregated by employer.
Outside money: C-6 independent expenditures and electioneering communications naming the candidate, by the spender’s filed stance. For and against are never netted.
Not a record of office: what someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages. This person also holds office: their voting record.