Political committee · Washington State

Office & Professional Employees Int’l Union Local No 8 POL ACTION COMM

Office & Professional Employees Int’l Union Local No 8 POL ACTION COMM is a political committee registered with the Washington Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle. It reported $6,262 from 500 contributors.

  • 2026 cycle
  • Political Committee
  • 500 contributors

$6,262

raised

$3,756

spent

$13

average contribution

The total divided by the reported contributor count.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

01

Money in — who funds this committee

The largest reported contributions. Washington requires committees to itemise contributions above a threshold; smaller gifts are reported in aggregate.

Largest reported contributors
Contributor City Amount
LIDDLE LESLIE OLYMPIA $303
POWELL TARA TACOMA $298
Pelletier Lillian Seattle $285
KRAMER HELEN OLYMPIA $215
ADAMSON ERIN TACOMA $212
Ehalt MIchael Lynnwood $195
Larsen Carissa Marysville $180
Holtzinger Cruz Jesse Normandy Park $178
MURPHY THERESE OLYMPIA $160
CARLSON ELAINE ENUMCLAW $159
MASON-PLACEK CHELSEA PUYALLUP $150
EVANS DAVID SEATTLE $140
MAINS SHANNON SEATTLE $130
GUTIERREZ DULCE (CANDY) SEATTLE $125
FLORES NALLELY P EDMONDS $125
KAWABATA BRICK BREMERTON $120
QUACKENBUSH JASON SEATAC $120
Colvin Yessenia Pasco $110
FELDSHER PHOEBE SEATTLE $108
Pipaphon Taylor N Seattle $100

Contributions are not broken down by size, and employers are not named. Washington collects an employer field for individual contributions, and gift-size banding is what separates a committee funded by a hundred neighbours from one funded by three donors. We store only the largest contributors, so neither analysis is possible here — and computing concentration from a top-ten list would produce a confident number that is simply wrong.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28 · $3,412 of $6,262 shown across 20 of 500 contributors

02

How concentrated the money is

Computed from every itemised contribution rather than from the largest few, which is what makes the share meaningful.

34.9%

from the top 10 donors

Out of 500 itemised contributors in total.

500

itemised contributors

Who it came from

The PDC types every contributor. This does not follow a PAC’s own money back to a person — see what this page will not compute — but it does say how much arrived from individuals rather than from other organisations.

Contributions by contributor type
Contributor type Amount Share Gifts
Individual $6,262 100% 500

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28

03

Money out — where it went

$3,756

total spent

60%

of what it raised

Spending as a share of contributions received.

2

largest payees listed

Who it paid

Largest payees, with the category the committee chose when filing. A consultancy, printer or polling firm appearing across many committees is a fact about who runs campaigns in Washington.

Largest payees reported by this committee
Payee Amount Payments Category as filed
Opeiu International Office $2,400 1 Other
Opeiu International Office $1,357 1 Monetary contributions to PAC or candidate

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings · as of 2026-07-28

04

Does it add up

The arithmetic, in the open. Reported contributions less reported spending is what the committee should still be holding.

Reported contributions $6,262
Reported expenditures − $3,756
Implied balance $2,506

This is what the two filings imply, not a bank balance. Committees also report cash on hand directly, and the two figures can differ where a report is outstanding.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

05

Across cycles

Other filings under the same PDC committee id.

Only one cycle on file. We hold a single filing for committee 14296. That means it registered for one election, or that our sync covers only the cycles this one falls in — the filings do not distinguish the two.

Last checked 2026-07-28

06

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

Who is really behind a committee that funds this one
We show every contributor the committee reported, and how much of its money came from organisations rather than individuals. A committee funded by another committee is common, and following that chain to the people at the end of it means joining filings across organisations and cycles — a join we have not made, and one that would be wrong to guess at.
Who the independent spending was aimed at
The filings name the candidate or measure each independent expenditure supported or opposed. We hold the amounts and which way they cut, but have not joined them to those records, so the page says how much and not against whom.
Whether the spending worked
We hold what was raised, what was spent, and in some cases the result. Connecting them would be a causal claim from two numbers, and spending is not the only thing that moves an election.
Anything below the itemisation threshold
Washington lets small contributions and small expenses be reported as lump sums with no counterparty. That money is in the totals and cannot be broken out by anyone, including the PDC. Where a lump is large, the page says so.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Office & Professional Employees Int’l Union Local No 8 POL ACTION COMM,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-07-28, accessed 2026-08-10. https://washingtonindependents.org/committee/office-professional-employees-int-l-union-local-no-8-pol-action-comm/

06

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

Public Disclosure Commission committee filings
Registration, contribution and expenditure totals, and the largest reported contributors. The original record is at the PDC.
Not loaded
Itemised expenditures, contributor employers, gift-size banding, and independent expenditure filings. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.