ESHB 1410 — Operating budget
ESHB 1410 was introduced in the 1995-96 Washington legislative session by WAYSSilver. It became law.
- 1995-96 session
- House
- Became law
- No public hearing
- Sponsor: WAYS(Silver
Source Washington State Legislature web services: legislation, hearings and roll calls · as of 2026-09-09 · introduced 1995-03-22
01
Where it stopped
Became law
- Last recorded action
- Chapter 18, 1995 Laws 2nd Special Session PV.
- Session law
- C 18 L 95 E2 — chapter and year in the session laws
- Public hearing
- Not established — no hearing records for this session — a public hearing is where testimony is taken; an executive session is where a committee votes
Source WA Legislature bill history — every row links to the chamber record that establishes it · as of 2026-09-09 · how a stop point is read
02
What it would do
The Legislature’s own description. We do not paraphrase legislation.
Making appropriations for the 1995-97 biennium.
Source WA Legislature bill digest and text, quoted whole · as of 2026-09-09 · edits none — we write no summary of our own
03
The votes
Recorded floor votes. Committee votes are in the hearing record below.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 583 PELESKY ON PAGE 32
61
yea
37
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 613 SMITH ON PAGE 32
97
yea
1
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 615 ROMERO ON PAGE 36, LINE 10
37
yea
61
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 616 ROMERO ON PAGE 36, LINE 10
42
yea
56
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 528 BROWN ON PAGE 37, LINE 6
45
yea
53
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 534 GRANT ON PAGE 40, LINE 7
22
yea
76
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 507 QUALL ON PAGE 69, LINE 20
42
yea
56
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 457 JACOBSEN ON PAGE 76
37
yea
61
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 516 SOMMERS ON PAGE 77, LINE 17
35
yea
63
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 619 DELLWO ON PAGE 78, LINE 1
40
yea
58
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
Final Passage
59
yea
39
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 485 KESSLER ON PAGE 41
48
yea
50
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 599 BASICH ON PAGE 47, LINE 26
43
yea
54
nay
1
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 522 FISHER, G. ON PAGE 55, LINE 5
39
yea
59
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 492 FISHER, G. ON PAGE 57, LINE 7
45
yea
53
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 526 FISHER, G. ON PAGE 64
42
yea
56
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 515 SOMMERS ON PAGE 23
39
yea
59
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 470 DELLWO ON PAGE 23, LINE 33
42
yea
55
nay
1
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 560 MORRIS ON PAGE 24, LINE 23
41
yea
57
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 549 MORRIS ON PAGE 24, LINE 23
38
yea
60
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 475 THIBAUDEAU ON PAGE 27, LINE 13
45
yea
53
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 481 PATTERSON ON PAGE 29
35
yea
63
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 521 THIBAUDEAU ON PAGE 31, LINE 8 – MOTION TO RECONSIDER
51
yea
46
nay
1
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 521 THIBAUDEAU ON PAGE 31, LINE 8
116
yea
80
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 620 THOMAS, B. ON PAGE 31, LINE 8
52
yea
46
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 455 CODY ON PAGE 31, LINE 8
45
yea
53
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 555 CONWAY ON PAGE 3
39
yea
59
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 524 CAIRNES ON PAGE 4
43
yea
55
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 458 HATFIELD ON PAGE 10, LINE 32
38
yea
60
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 467 VELORIA ON PAGE 10, LINE 34
40
yea
58
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 590 GRANT ON PAGE 10, LINE 34
45
yea
53
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 614 CONWAY ON PAGE 18
39
yea
59
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-03-24
AMD 446 OGDEN ON PAGE 19, LINE 12
38
yea
60
nay
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
SENATE · 1995-03-31
Final Passage
28
yea
19
nay
2
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-04-07
MOTION TO CONCUR IN SENATE AMD
35
yea
60
nay
2
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-05-23
Final Passage
58
yea
37
nay
3
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
SENATE · 1995-05-23
AMENDMENT BY SENATORS ROACH AND LONG TO THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS AMENDMENT ON PAGE 54, AFTER LINE 21 – FAILED. (NEEDED 60% VOTE)
26
yea
21
nay
2
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
SENATE · 1995-05-23
Final Passage
72
yea
23
nay
3
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
HOUSE · 1995-05-24
Final Passage
166
yea
115
nay
13
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
SENATE · 1995-05-24
AMENDMENT BY SENATOR SCHOW TO THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS AMENDMENT ON PAGE 24, LINE 5 – FAILED.
21
yea
25
nay
3
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
SENATE · 1995-05-24
Final Passage
36
yea
11
nay
2
absent or excused
This roll call is not broken out by caucus. We hold every member’s vote. What we do not hold for this session is the chamber roster that says which caucus each of them belonged to — the roll call itself prints a surname and nothing more. Matching a surname to a party is the name-only identity join this site refuses everywhere else, so the split is withheld rather than guessed, and the totals above stand as filed.
Sources WA Legislature roll-call archive (floor); chamber roster for party · as of 2026-09-09 · rows 41 recorded votes · key member id printed on the roll call, joined to the chamber roster — never a surname · seats the denominator is the constitutional chamber, 98 House and 49 Senate, not our roster · note committee votes are published as sign-off sheets, not roll calls, and are not counted here; the caucus split is withheld where we hold no roster for the session
04
Sponsors
Who put their name to the bill. The Legislature records a prime sponsor on the bill status; the full co-sponsor roster appears only in the introduced bill text, which we have not ingested.
Prime sponsor
WAYS(Silver
as printed the sponsor line on the bill status record · introduced in the House. A committee substitute prints the committee here, with the originating member in parentheses.
The co-sponsor roster is not on this page. We hold the prime sponsor the Legislature prints on the bill status, not the list of co-sponsors, which is published only in the introduced bill text we have not ingested. A co-sponsor count here would be a number no record we hold contains.
Source WA Legislature legislation service · as of 2026-09-09
05
The hearing record
Every committee meeting where this bill appeared on the agenda. Public is where testimony is taken; Executive is where the committee votes. Anyone may register a position on a bill before its hearing without speaking. Those sign-ins are a public record of who showed up — they are not a poll, not a sample of the state, and not a measure of public opinion. They count the people who knew the hearing was happening.
Committee hearing records for the 1995-96 session are not available. The Legislature publishes committee hearing records from the 2003-04 session onward; for earlier sessions there is nothing to read. Whether this bill received a public hearing cannot be established either way, so we say nothing about it.
Last checked 2026-09-09
06
What changed between versions
| Version | Substitute | Engrossed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| HB 1410 | — | — | 1st substitute bill substituted. |
| ESHB 1410 | 1 | 1 | Chapter 18, 1995 Laws 2nd Special Session PV. |
We do not hold the bill text, so we cannot say what changed. The version list shows that the bill was rewritten and how many times. Comparing the substance of two versions needs the text of each, which we have not ingested. The Legislature publishes both.
Last checked 2026-09-09
Source WA Legislature bill text archive, every version · as of 2026-09-09 · note versions are listed, not compared — a field-by-field diff is prepared by a person or not at all
08
What this page will not compute
Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.
- Who killed it
- We can say a bill was never scheduled for a public hearing. We cannot say who decided that. Chairs control agendas, but the record does not attribute a non-decision to a person, and we will not infer one from a committee roster.
- Why it died
- Withdrawn, superseded by its own companion, folded into a budget, or simply never taken up — all four look identical in the data.
- Whether lobbying affected it
- Washington collects lobbyist compensation and employer registrations, and the summary feed we hold of them carries no bill column — checked against lobbyist_compensation and lobbyist_reporting, neither of which has one. So we hold no documented link between a lobbying report and a bill number and publish none. That is a limit of the extract, not a claim that no filing anywhere names a bill: reading the L-2 report body is what it would take to find out.
- What changed between versions
- We hold the version list, not the text of each version.
- How a member would have voted
- Only recorded votes appear here. A member absent from a roll call is recorded as absent, not as opposed.
- Sign-ins as public opinion
- A hearing sign-in sheet counts the people who knew the hearing was happening and could reach it. It is a public record of who showed up, not a poll, not a sample of the state, and not a measure of what Washington thinks. A bill with more sign-ins against it than for it has not been voted down by the public.
- An importance score
- No ranking of this bill against others, no “major legislation” badge, no prediction of what it will do next. Every bill gets the same page whether it passed, died, or was never heard, and there is no editorial selection of which bills receive one.
09
Common questions
- What happened to ESHB 1410?
- ESHB 1410 became law. The Legislature’s status record places it at “C 18 L 95 E2” — its chapter and year in the session laws.
- Who sponsored ESHB 1410?
- The prime sponsor of record is WAYS(Silver, as printed on the bill status. This page does not list co-sponsors — that roster is published only in the introduced bill text, which we have not ingested.
- What would ESHB 1410 do?
- In the Legislature’s own description: “Making appropriations for the 1995-97 biennium.” We quote the official language rather than summarising, because a paraphrase of legislation is an interpretation.
- Was there a recorded vote on ESHB 1410?
- Yes. 41 recorded floor votes appear on this page, member counts and all. Committee votes are held separately as scanned sign-off sheets and are not counted here.
- Did ESHB 1410 get a public hearing?
- Committee hearing records for the 1995-96 session are not available to us, so whether ESHB 1410 was publicly heard cannot be established either way.
Answers are generated from the same fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.
Cite this page
This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.
“ESHB 1410 — Operating budget,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-09, accessed 2026-10-21. https://washingtonindependents.org/bill/1995-96-hb-1410/
JSON endpointReport a correction
Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.
10
How this page is built
Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.
- WA Legislature legislation service
- Bill id, titles, sponsor, introduced date, and the history line and location code we render as its status.
- WA Legislature committee hearing records
- Every committee agenda this bill appeared on, and whether each was a public hearing or an executive session.
- WA Legislature roll call service
- Recorded floor votes, member by member.
- Outcome
- Derived, not published by the Legislature. Enacted means a chapter number or effective date is on record; died is only ever assigned once a session has ended; a sitting session yields pending and no death is asserted.
- Not loaded
- Bill text, amendments, committee votes as individual member records, testimony, and fiscal notes.
Reporting that cites this record
Listed because each story cites this record, newest first. Stories are signed and in our voice; nothing from them appears in the record above.
No story cites this record yet. The list fills itself when one does; nobody adds a story here by hand. All reporting