Clyde Shavers

Clyde Shavers is running for STATE REPRESENTATIVE, District 10 in LEG DISTRICT 10 – HOUSE in 2026.

DDemocraticSTATE REPRESENTATIVELEG DISTRICT 10 – HOUSE2026 cycle

Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings · as of 2026-07-28

01

What the campaign raised and spent

Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.

$65,940

raised

$28,798

spent

$37,142

cash on hand

As of the most recent report, not today.

156

contributors

$423

average contribution

Total divided by reported contributors.

Spent by other people

Independent expenditures — money spent by committees, parties or unions advocating for or against this candidate. It is not the candidate’s money and is not included above. By law it is spent without coordinating with the campaign, so it is neither a favour accepted nor an attack invited.

Independent expenditures supporting and opposing this candidate
Position Reported
Supporting this candidate $126
Opposing this candidate $39,446

This does not say who spent it. The totals come from the candidate’s own record. Which committees spent the money, and on what, is filed separately by those committees — we hold that data but have not yet joined it to this page.

Last checked 2026-07-28

02

Largest reported contributors

Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.

Largest reported contributors to this campaign
Contributor Amount City Employer
Washbank PAC State Fund $2,400 Seattle
Jackson Legacy Fund $2,400 Seattle
Wayne P. Dunn $2,050 Mineral Wells Drs Bowling and Dunn
Sharon A. Vaughn $2,000 Coupeville Retired
Kay Dunn $1,950 Mineral Wells The Dunn Foundation Inc
Clyde Shavers $1,732 Clinton WA Legislature
Anne S. Tearse $1,500 Freeland Not Employed
Shirley A. Bennett $1,500 Coupeville Retired
USAA $1,200 San Antonio
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC $1,200 Washington
Regence $1,200 Seattle
Harry Truman Fund $1,200 Seattle
Puget Sound Energy $1,200 Bellevue
Delta Dental of WA $1,200 Seattle
SEIU Healthcare 1199NW United for Quality Care $1,200 Kent
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community $1,200 La Conner
Proliance Surgeons PAC $1,200 Seattle
Regence Blue Shield $1,200 Seattle
Washington Beer & Wine Distributors Association $1,200 Olympia

6 of 19 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-07-28 · top 19 shown

03

Where the money went

Largest reported expenditures. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.

Largest reported expenditures by this campaign
Vendor Amount Category as filed
Gusto $9,254 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Argo Strategies $6,225 Management and consulting services
EXPENSES OF $200.00 OR LESS $5,636
Cerillion N4 Partners $3,011 Management and consulting services,Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc.
WA State Democratic Central Committee $1,830 Inkind contribution,Computers, printers, software, phones, etc.
Clyde Shavers $1,732 Inkind contribution
WA Secretary of State $677 Filing fees
House Demo Camp Comm $218 Inkind contribution
House Democratic Campaign Committee $214 Inkind contribution
Hospitals for a Healthy Future PAC/HHFPAC $0 Contribution Refunds

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-07-28 · top 10 shown

04

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from the candidate’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission. Nothing here is estimated, modelled or inferred.

This is a filing, not a live balance. Campaigns report on a schedule, and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record — 2026-07-28, and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.

Money is not a prediction. The better-funded candidate frequently loses. This page shows who paid for a campaign; it does not show who won, and it makes no claim about either.

A candidate is not the same record as an officeholder. What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions, kept on separate pages.

Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings, 2026 cycle · as of 2026-07-28 · filer SHAVC–630

The original filing at the PDC

Something wrong here? corrections@washingtonindependents.org · how corrections work