Candidate · PDC filing · 2026 cycle · filer BROND–784

Dan Bronoske

Dan Bronoske is running for State Representative in Leg District 28 – House in 2026. This page is the campaign’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission: what it raised, who gave it, where it went, and what others spent about the candidate. It is not a record of holding office; that is a different page.

DDemocraticState RepresentativeLeg District 28 – House
Filed as
Daniel A. Bronoske legal name on the declaration; the ballot name is above
Office, as filed
STATE REPRESENTATIVE · LEG DISTRICT 28 – HOUSE
Party preference
as stated on the filing: DEMOCRATIC

Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings (C-1) and reports (C-3, C-4) · as of 2026-10-21 · key PDC filer id — the one identifier the state issues a campaign · note names, office and party are copied from the filing; only the capitalisation is ours

01

What the campaign raised and spent

Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.

$153K

raised

$6,185

spent

$147K

cash on hand

As of the most recent report, not today.

182

contributors

$840

average contribution

Total divided by reported contributors.

Source Washington Public Disclosure Commission, candidate C-3 contribution and C-4 expenditure filings · as of 2026-10-21 · contributors 182 reported · note independent expenditures are filed by the spending committee, are not in these figures, and are in section 04 · how candidate money is tracked

02

Largest reported contributors

Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.

Largest reported contributors to this campaign
Contributor Amount City Employer
TEAM SELECT HOME CARE $2,400 PHOENIX
WA STATE PHARMACY PAC $2,400 RENTON
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB $2,400 TAMPA
COUNCIL OF POLICE POLITICAL SUPPORT $2,400 OLYMPIA
REGENCE BLUESHIELD $2,400 SEATTLE
WA REFUSE & RECYCLING ASSN PAC $2,400 LACEY
JACKSON LEGACY FUND $2,400 SEATTLE
WA STATE DENTAL PAC $2,400 SEATTLE
ELI LILLY & COMPANY $2,400 INDIANAPOLIS
SEIU HEALTHCARE 1199NW PAC $2,400 RENTON
GENENTECH USA $2,400 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC. $2,400 ENGLEWOOD
CVS PHARMACY, INC. $2,400 WOONSOCKET
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC $2,400 SEATTLE
PORT GAMBLE SKLALLAM TRIBE $2,400 KINGSTON
NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE $2,400 OLYMPIA
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY $2,400 FORT WORTH
PROLIANCE SURGEONS PAC $2,400 SEATTLE
CIGNA Holding Company $2,400 WASHINGTON
GILEAD SCIENCES INC $2,400 RALEIGH

0 of 20 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-10-21

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-10-21 · 20 named, 0 aggregated

03

Where the money went

The largest payees this site names. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.

Largest named payees of this campaign
Vendor Amount Category as filed
Dan Bronoske $2,382 Filing fees,Inkind contribution,Utilities, phone, and other overhead costs,Rent, lease, mortgage, PO box rental
ABBOT TAYLOR $2,044 Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc.
XPRESS SIGN COMPANY $286 Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc.

1 payee is not named. 1 could not be shown to be either a person or an organisation — the expenditure filing carries no payee type, and neither the PDC’s contributor file nor a legal form such as LLC or Inc. settles it — and is withheld until the record shows which; it was paid $330 in all. The money is in the campaign’s spending total above, and every itemised payment is public at the PDC.

Last checked 2026-10-21

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-10-21 · 3 named payees shown

04

Money spent about this candidate by others

Independent expenditures and electioneering communications — money spent about this candidate by committees that are barred by law from coordinating with the campaign. It is not the candidate’s money and is not in the figures above. Spending for a candidate is not money from the candidate, and spending for and against are two facts, shown as two figures.

  1. Spent supporting

    stance filed as “for”

    $216
  2. Spent opposing

    stance filed as “against” · not subtracted from the row above

    none filed
  • Fuse Votes for · $216

Source Public Disclosure Commission, C-6 independent expenditure and electioneering communication reports naming this candidate · as of 2026-10-21 · scale $216 = full width · key the candidate the spender named on the C-6, matched by PDC candidate id · caveat for and against are not netted

05

What this page will not compute

A candidate page is where a reader expects a verdict about the person. Each of these is a verdict the filings do not support.

No prediction.
Money is not a forecast. The better-funded candidate frequently loses, and this page shows who paid for a campaign, not who will win.
No net money.
Spending for and spending against a candidate are two facts. Subtracting one from the other manufactures a third that nobody reported.
No donor we cannot name by rule.
A private individual is named only when their own public conduct clears them; everyone else is aggregated by employer. The rule is applied at sync and again at render, and no page relaxes it.
No connected-records section.
A candidate is not a node in the entity graph. Their money is on their committee’s filings, which is where the record lives; this page is a reading of those filings, not a second record.
No record of office.
What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages. Where this person also holds office, the methodology links their record.

06

Common questions

What office is Dan Bronoske running for?
State Representative, as filed with the Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle.
How much has Dan Bronoske raised?
$152,936 reported raised and $6,185 reported spent, from 182 reported contributors, as of the last filing we read. Figures change as reports are filed and amended.
What party is Dan Bronoske?
The filing states “DEMOCRATIC”. Washington ballots carry a party preference, not a membership, and this page says only what the filing says.
Who is spending money about Dan Bronoske?
Independent expenditures and electioneering communications total $216 supporting and $0 opposing, as two separate figures. The spenders are filed on the C-6 and are named in section 04 where the sync has carried them.

Answers are generated from the same filing fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Daniel A. Bronoske (Dan Bronoske),” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-10-21, accessed 2026-10-26. https://washingtonindependents.org/candidate/daniel-a-bronoske-dan-bronoske/

The original filing at the PDCJSON endpointReport a correction

Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.

07

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

A filing, not a live balance
campaigns report on a schedule and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record (2026-10-21), and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.
Identity
the PDC filer id (BROND–784) — the one identifier the state issues a campaign. Two candidates sharing a name are two filer ids and two pages.
Money
C-3 contributions and C-4 expenditures reported by the campaign, 2026 cycle. Contributors are named only where the donor-naming rule clears them; the rest are aggregated by employer.
Outside money
C-6 independent expenditures and electioneering communications naming the candidate, by the spender’s filed stance. For and against are never netted.
Not a record of office
what someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages. This person also holds office: their voting record.