What office is Jaime Michelle Hawk running for?

State Supreme Court Justice, as filed with the Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle.

How much has Jaime Michelle Hawk raised?

$246,471 reported raised and $195,443 reported spent, from 403 reported contributors, as of the last filing we read. Figures change as reports are filed and amended.

What party is Jaime Michelle Hawk?

The filing states no party preference.

Who is spending money about Jaime Michelle Hawk?

Independent expenditures and electioneering communications total $14,844 supporting and $0 opposing, as two separate figures. The spenders are filed on the C-6 and are named in section 04 where the sync has carried them.

Candidate · PDC filing · 2026 cycle · filer HAWKJ–665

Jaime Michelle Hawk

Jaime Michelle Hawk is running for State Supreme Court Justice in 2026. This page is the campaign’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission: what it raised, who gave it, where it went, and what others spent about the candidate. It is not a record of holding office; that is a different page.

—No party listedState Supreme Court JusticeSupreme Court

Filed as: Jaime Hawk legal name on the declaration; the ballot name is above
Office, as filed: STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE · SUPREME COURT
Party preference: none stated

Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings (C-1) and reports (C-3, C-4) · as of 2026-09-12 · key PDC filer id — the one identifier the state issues a campaign · note names, office and party are copied from the filing; only the capitalisation is ours

What the campaign raised and spent

Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.

$246K

raised

$195K

spent

$51,028

cash on hand

As of the most recent report, not today.

403

contributors

$612

average contribution

Total divided by reported contributors.

Source Washington Public Disclosure Commission, candidate C-3 contribution and C-4 expenditure filings · as of 2026-09-12 · contributors 403 reported · note independent expenditures are filed by the spending committee, are not in these figures, and are in section 04 · how candidate money is tracked

Largest reported contributors

Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.

Largest reported contributors to this campaign
Contributor	Amount	City	Employer
Jaime Hawk (Jaime Michelle Hawk)	$5,000	Seattle
Thorp Rondi	$4,800	Spokane	Thorp Law Group, PS
Pfau Cochran Vertetis Amala PLLC	$4,800	Seattle
Pellicciotti Michael	$4,800	Federal Way	State of Washington
Jaime Hawk	$2,670
Boggs Paula	$2,400	Sammamish	Boggs Media LLC

Individual contributors, grouped by stated employer
Employer stated by contributors	Contributors	Amount
Pfau Cochran Vertetis Amala PLLC	1	$4,800
homemaker	1	$4,800
BORDE LAW PLLC	1	$2,500
Convergent Strategic Consulting	1	$2,400
Columbia Legal Services	1	$2,400
Nixon Peabody	1	$2,400
Hypomania Content	1	$2,400
No employer stated	6	$28,800

Why some contributors are not named. Private individuals are not named on this site unless their own public conduct — holding or seeking office, running an agency, or testifying to the legislature — already makes them a public figure. Their giving is shown here aggregated by the employer they stated. The full itemised record is public at the PDC.

3 of 6 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-09-12

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-09-12 · 6 named, 8 aggregated

Where the money went

Largest reported expenditures. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.

Largest reported expenditures by this campaign
Vendor	Amount	Category as filed
NWP Consulting	$138,681	Management and consulting services,Design/graphic art, etc.,Broadcast/cable TV advertising
Newman Partners	$16,500	Management and consulting services
Madrona Bureau	$12,000	Design/graphic art, etc.
Anedot	$6,231	Bank and payment processing charges
NGP VAN	$4,085	Utilities, phone, and other overhead costs,Bank and payment processing charges
Smith Jamie	$4,000	Management and consulting services
Lo Andy	$3,400	Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc.
Jaime Hawk	$2,670	Inkind contribution
Schwartz Ella	$1,634	Postage costs, mail permits, purchase of stamps,Office supplies, furniture, staff food & beverages, etc.
Thorp Law	$1,384	Inkind contribution
Frahs Jessica	$1,029	Fundraising events and related costs
Navigate Law	$852	Inkind contribution
Pfau Cochran Vertetis Amala PLLC	$405	Inkind contribution
Luxlaxa LLC	$350	Design/graphic art, etc.
Rushbanks Law PLLC	$250	Inkind contribution
Fleck Clay	$228	Other
TLS Prints	$227	Campaign merchandise/paraphernalia
Overnight Printing	$209	Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc.
Allison John	$200	Inkind contribution

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-09-12 · top 19 shown

Money spent about this candidate by others

Independent expenditures and electioneering communications — money spent about this candidate by committees that are barred by law from coordinating with the campaign. It is not the candidate’s money and is not in the figures above. Spending for a candidate is not money from the candidate, and spending for and against are two facts, shown as two figures.

Spent supporting
stance filed as “for”
$14,844
Spent opposing
stance filed as “against” · not subtracted from the row above
none filed

Fuse Votes for · $11,272
Beware the Attack on Our Courts for · $2,000
Seattle Indivisible for · $1,477
Rural Working Families Sponsored by Firelands Workers United for · $95

Source Public Disclosure Commission, C-6 independent expenditure and electioneering communication reports naming this candidate · as of 2026-09-12 · scale $14,844 = full width · key the candidate the spender named on the C-6, matched by PDC candidate id · caveat for and against are not netted

What this page will not compute

A candidate page is where a reader expects a verdict about the person. Each of these is a verdict the filings do not support.

No prediction.: Money is not a forecast. The better-funded candidate frequently loses, and this page shows who paid for a campaign, not who will win.
No net money.: Spending for and spending against a candidate are two facts. Subtracting one from the other manufactures a third that nobody reported.
No donor we cannot name by rule.: A private individual is named only when their own public conduct clears them; everyone else is aggregated by employer. The rule is applied at sync and again at render, and no page relaxes it.
No connected-records section.: A candidate is not a node in the entity graph. Their money is on their committee’s filings, which is where the record lives; this page is a reading of those filings, not a second record.
No record of office.: What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages. Where this person also holds office, the methodology links their record.

Common questions

What office is Jaime Michelle Hawk running for?: State Supreme Court Justice, as filed with the Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle.
How much has Jaime Michelle Hawk raised?: $246,471 reported raised and $195,443 reported spent, from 403 reported contributors, as of the last filing we read. Figures change as reports are filed and amended.
What party is Jaime Michelle Hawk?: The filing states no party preference.
Who is spending money about Jaime Michelle Hawk?: Independent expenditures and electioneering communications total $14,844 supporting and $0 opposing, as two separate figures. The spenders are filed on the C-6 and are named in section 04 where the sync has carried them.

Answers are generated from the same filing fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Jaime Hawk (Jaime Michelle Hawk),” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-12, accessed 2026-09-20. https://washingtonindependents.org/candidate/jaime-hawk-jaime-michelle-hawk/

The original filing at the PDC JSON endpoint Report a correction

Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

A filing, not a live balance: campaigns report on a schedule and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record (2026-09-12), and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.
Identity: the PDC filer id (HAWKJ–665) — the one identifier the state issues a campaign. Two candidates sharing a name are two filer ids and two pages.
Money: C-3 contributions and C-4 expenditures reported by the campaign, 2026 cycle. Contributors are named only where the donor-naming rule clears them; the rest are aggregated by employer.
Outside money: C-6 independent expenditures and electioneering communications naming the candidate, by the spender’s filed stance. For and against are never netted.
Not a record of office: what someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions on separate pages.