Keith Scully

Keith Scully is running for STATE REPRESENTATIVE, District 32 in LEG DISTRICT 32 – HOUSE in 2026.

DDemocraticSTATE REPRESENTATIVELEG DISTRICT 32 – HOUSE2026 cycle

Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings · as of 2026-07-28

01

What the campaign raised and spent

Reported to the Public Disclosure Commission by the campaign itself. Figures are as filed — the PDC publishes what candidates report, and a late or amended filing changes them.

$82,538

raised

$63,999

spent

$18,539

cash on hand

As of the most recent report, not today.

195

contributors

$423

average contribution

Total divided by reported contributors.

Spent by other people

Independent expenditures — money spent by committees, parties or unions advocating for or against this candidate. It is not the candidate’s money and is not included above. By law it is spent without coordinating with the campaign, so it is neither a favour accepted nor an attack invited.

Independent expenditures supporting and opposing this candidate
Position Reported
Supporting this candidate $126
Opposing this candidate $0

This does not say who spent it. The totals come from the candidate’s own record. Which committees spent the money, and on what, is filed separately by those committees — we hold that data but have not yet joined it to this page.

Last checked 2026-07-28

02

Largest reported contributors

Individual contributions above the itemisation threshold. Smaller giving is reported as a lump and is included in the total above but cannot be broken out.

Largest reported contributors to this campaign
Contributor Amount City Employer
Keith Scully $18,000 Seattle
IUOE LOCAL 302 SPF $2,400 BOTHELL
SCULLY FRAN $2,400 SANTA CRUZ
SCULLY TOM $2,400 SANTA CRUZ
FOUTS SCOTT CAROLINE $1,700 PASO ROBLES
DONCKERS BRENDAN $1,535 VASHON BRESKIN JOHNSON TOWNSEND
MCCORMICK TOM $1,300 SHORELINE NOT EMPLOYED
MERRYMAN MARJORIE $1,250 NEW YORK
NEWMAN JESSICA $1,200 MALIBU NEWMAN LLP
NEWMAN DEREK $1,200 MALIBU NEWMAN LLP
PAINE SUSAN $1,200 EDMONDS CITY OF EDMONDS
CHELGREN SCOTT $1,200 EDMONDS
COHEN SARAH $1,200 SHORELINE AMESA
SUN ERIC $1,200 SEATTLE SELF
COBURN ALAN $1,200 SEATTLE
MALIHI JIAN $1,200 SEATTLE CLARITY FARMS
WEBER SHANA $1,200 ANN ARBOR UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
HUNT JOHN $1,200 TACOMA H&M EXTRACTS
SCULLY KEVIN $1,200 ANN ARBOR ANN ARBOR ROWING CLUB

11 of 19 listed contributors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor, and a blank means only that it was left blank. It doubles as an occupation box, so “retired” and “self-employed” appear in it too and are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution reports · as of 2026-07-28 · top 19 shown

03

Where the money went

Largest reported expenditures. The category is the code the campaign chose when filing, not our classification of it.

Largest reported expenditures by this campaign
Vendor Amount Category as filed
NWP CONSULTING $25,751 Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc. ,Management and consulting services,Design/graphic art, etc.
TISSOT SOLUTIONS LLC $18,257 Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc. ,Management and consulting services,Utilities, phone, and other overhead costs,Robocalls
PUBLISHERS MAILING SERVICE $11,586 Management and consulting services,Postage costs, mail permits, purchase of stamps
ABBOT TAYLOR $1,932 Accounting, legal, regulatory compliance, etc.
WA STATE DEMOCRATS $1,800 Inkind contribution,Utilities, phone, and other overhead costs
ANEDOT $1,397 Bank and payment processing charges
CAPITOL CITY PRESS $1,039 Printing campaign signs
EXPENSES OF $200.00 OR LESS $877
Keith Scully $677 Inkind contribution
DONCKERS BRENDAN $535 Inkind contribution
ROBERTSON BETSY $75 Inkind contribution
GORIAWALLA FAISAL $74 Inkind contribution

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure reports · as of 2026-07-28 · top 12 shown

04

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from the candidate’s own filings with the Public Disclosure Commission. Nothing here is estimated, modelled or inferred.

This is a filing, not a live balance. Campaigns report on a schedule, and amend afterwards. The figures are what had been filed when we last read the record — 2026-07-28, and the PDC is authoritative where it disagrees.

Money is not a prediction. The better-funded candidate frequently loses. This page shows who paid for a campaign; it does not show who won, and it makes no claim about either.

A candidate is not the same record as an officeholder. What someone says while running and how they vote once serving are separate questions, kept on separate pages. See their voting record.

Source Public Disclosure Commission candidate filings, 2026 cycle · as of 2026-07-28 · filer SCULK 114

The original filing at the PDC

Something wrong here? corrections@washingtonindependents.org · how corrections work