Political committee · Washington State

Lewis County Republican Central Committee (LCRCC)

Lewis County Republican Central Committee (LCRCC) is a political committee registered with the Washington Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle. It reported $51,687 from 150 contributors.

  • 2026 cycle
  • Political Committee
  • 150 contributors

$51,687

raised

$20,074

spent

$345

average contribution

The total divided by the reported contributor count.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

01

Money in — who funds this committee

The largest reported contributions. Washington requires committees to itemise contributions above a threshold; smaller gifts are reported in aggregate.

Largest reported contributors
Contributor City Amount
2026 Community Yard Sale (low-cost fundraiser) Silver Creek $10,008
MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS Chehalis $8,312
SMALL CONTRIBUTIONS $3,290
LINCOLN DAY DINNER (low-cost fundraiser) Chehalis $2,230
CRUVER AMY EATONVILLE $1,350
Kim Franklin Chehalis $1,216
DAVIS ARNY CHEHALIS $1,100
YANISH JEFF TOLEDO $1,070
MURPHY TRACY CHEHALIS $1,033
Stahl Mark edmonds $950
WARREN CANDY WINLOCK $905
LCRP MONTHLY DINNER (low-cost fundraiser) Chehalis $901
CUP OF LOVE (low-cost fundraiser) Chehalis $900
ANONYMOUS CONTRIBUTIONS $881
SMITH LIZ CHEHALIS $815
FULLER CASSONDRA Chehalis $815
Howsden Thomas winlock $540
MCNAUGHT SCOTT WINLOCK $500
RIDER FRED CHEHALIS $500
DESKINS RYAN ROCHESTER $500

Contributions are not broken down by size, and employers are not named. Washington collects an employer field for individual contributions, and gift-size banding is what separates a committee funded by a hundred neighbours from one funded by three donors. We store only the largest contributors, so neither analysis is possible here — and computing concentration from a top-ten list would produce a confident number that is simply wrong.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28 · $37,816 of $51,687 shown across 20 of 150 contributors

02

How concentrated the money is

Computed from every itemised contribution rather than from the largest few, which is what makes the share meaningful.

53.2%

from the top 10 donors

Out of 150 itemised contributors in total.

150

itemised contributors

Who it came from

The PDC types every contributor. This does not follow a PAC’s own money back to a person — see what this page will not compute — but it does say how much arrived from individuals rather than from other organisations.

Contributions by contributor type
Contributor type Amount Share Gifts
Individual $22,705 58.2% 102
Low-cost Fundraiser $15,112 38.7% 24
Party $1,216 3.1% 7

Colleagues who gave on the same day

Three or more people sharing an employer, giving to this committee on a single date. Money arriving together is the pattern; a shared employer on its own is not.

Same-day contributions from colleagues at one employer
Date Employer Donors Total
2026-04-11 TOLEDO TELEPHONE CO 3 $1,450

This shows money arriving together, not who arranged it. An office collection, a fundraiser one colleague hosted, a firm’s partners each writing a cheque on the day they were asked — all three look identical in the filings, and all three are legal. Nothing here says the employer knew, still less that it directed anyone.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Employers behind more than one donor

Across the whole cycle rather than a single day. Weaker than the table above, and included because a slow accumulation from one workplace is still worth being able to see.

Employers with more than one contributor
Employer Donors Total
TOLEDO TELEPHONE CO 3 $1,450

Only 18.4% of itemised donors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor and left blank more often than not, so both employer tables show what we can see rather than everything that exists. Treat the counts as a floor. Occupations reported in the employer box — “retired”, “self-employed” — are excluded, because they are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28

03

Money out — where it went

$20,074

total spent

38.8%

of what it raised

Spending as a share of contributions received.

15

largest payees listed

Who it paid

Largest payees, with the category the committee chose when filing. A consultancy, printer or polling firm appearing across many committees is a fact about who runs campaigns in Washington.

Largest payees reported by this committee
Payee Amount Payments Category as filed
The LOFT $5,312 1 Rent, lease, mortgage, PO box rental
The LOFT $1,750 1 Fundraising events and related costs
SMITH KATY $1,264 1 Computers, printers, software, phones, etc.
THE CHRONICLE $1,000 1 Digital advertising
CT PUBLISHING LLC / The Silver Agency $1,000 1 Digital advertising
SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON FAIR $900 1 Fundraising events and related costs
CANVA.COM $696 2 Printing literature, fliers, postcards, etc.
BANNERBUZZ.COM $589 3 Printing campaign signs
Smith Kayden $500 1 Other
Hernandez Peyton $500 1 Other
Murphy Gracie $500 1 Other
VANILLAGIFT.COM $500 1 Utilities, phone, and other overhead costs
AMAZON $384 8 Fundraising events and related costs
AUCTRIA $375 1 Fundraising events and related costs
ZOHO Corp $366 1 Computers, printers, software, phones, etc.

A further $2,353 was reported as small expenses. Washington lets a committee report spending below a threshold as a single lump with no payee. That money is in the total above and cannot be broken out by anyone, including us.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings · as of 2026-07-28

04

Does it add up

The arithmetic, in the open. Reported contributions less reported spending is what the committee should still be holding.

Reported contributions $51,687
Reported expenditures − $20,074
Implied balance $31,613

This is what the two filings imply, not a bank balance. Committees also report cash on hand directly, and the two figures can differ where a report is outstanding.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

05

Across cycles

Other filings under the same PDC committee id.

Only one cycle on file. We hold a single filing for committee 11489. That means it registered for one election, or that our sync covers only the cycles this one falls in — the filings do not distinguish the two.

Last checked 2026-07-28

06

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

Who is really behind a committee that funds this one
We show every contributor the committee reported, and how much of its money came from organisations rather than individuals. A committee funded by another committee is common, and following that chain to the people at the end of it means joining filings across organisations and cycles — a join we have not made, and one that would be wrong to guess at.
Who the independent spending was aimed at
The filings name the candidate or measure each independent expenditure supported or opposed. We hold the amounts and which way they cut, but have not joined them to those records, so the page says how much and not against whom.
Whether the spending worked
We hold what was raised, what was spent, and in some cases the result. Connecting them would be a causal claim from two numbers, and spending is not the only thing that moves an election.
Anything below the itemisation threshold
Washington lets small contributions and small expenses be reported as lump sums with no counterparty. That money is in the totals and cannot be broken out by anyone, including the PDC. Where a lump is large, the page says so.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Lewis County Republican Central Committee (LCRCC),” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-07-28, accessed 2026-08-09. https://washingtonindependents.org/committee/lewis-county-republican-central-committee-lcrcc/

06

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

Public Disclosure Commission committee filings
Registration, contribution and expenditure totals, and the largest reported contributors. The original record is at the PDC.
Not loaded
Itemised expenditures, contributor employers, gift-size banding, and independent expenditure filings. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.