Political committee · Washington State

Thurston County Republican Central Committee (TCRP)

Thurston County Republican Central Committee (TCRP) is a political committee registered with the Washington Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle. It reported $38,230 from 84 contributors.

2026 cycle
Political Committee
84 contributors

$38,230

raised

$33,870

spent

$455

average contribution

The total divided by the reported contributor count.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

Money in — who funds this committee

The largest reported contributions. Washington requires committees to itemise contributions above a threshold; smaller gifts are reported in aggregate.

Largest reported contributors
Contributor	City	Amount
May Frank	Olympia	$3,630
Allen Tom	Olympia	$2,040
Grosvenor Michael	Hoodsport	$1,762
Braun John	Centralia	$1,636
Panowicz Linda	Olympia	$1,340
Gauny Corey	Olympia	$1,295
Johnson Cynthia	Olympia	$1,253
Martinez Dalia	Lacey	$1,185
HINMAN DEAN	Tumwater	$1,010
South Bay Automotive	Olympia	$1,000
MAYNARD JACKSON	OLYMPIA	$906
Shriver Veronica	Olympia	$882
Stacy Sherry	Tumwater	$881
Catterson Elizabeth	Lacey	$860
SMALL CONTRIBUTIONS		$749
Gibson Dave	Olympia	$732
MORRIS NANCY	Olympia	$698
Debray Edward	Olympia	$637
Peterson Lottie	Olympia	$622
Mcaferty Pat	Littlerock	$610

Contributions are not broken down by size, and employers are not named. Washington collects an employer field for individual contributions, and gift-size banding is what separates a committee funded by a hundred neighbours from one funded by three donors. We store only the largest contributors, so neither analysis is possible here — and computing concentration from a top-ten list would produce a confident number that is simply wrong.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28 · $23,728 of $38,230 shown across 20 of 84 contributors

How concentrated the money is

Computed from every itemised contribution rather than from the largest few, which is what makes the share meaningful.

43.1%

from the top 10 donors

Out of 84 itemised contributors in total.

itemised contributors

Who it came from

The PDC types every contributor. This does not follow a PAC’s own money back to a person — see what this page will not compute — but it does say how much arrived from individuals rather than from other organisations.

Contributions by contributor type
Contributor type	Amount	Share	Gifts
Individual	$36,481	97.3%	80
Business	$1,000	2.7%	1

Colleagues who gave on the same day

Three or more people sharing an employer, giving to this committee on a single date. Money arriving together is the pattern; a shared employer on its own is not.

Same-day contributions from colleagues at one employer
Date	Employer	Donors	Total
2026-03-28	unk	3	$1,495

This shows money arriving together, not who arranged it. An office collection, a fundraiser one colleague hosted, a firm’s partners each writing a cheque on the day they were asked — all three look identical in the filings, and all three are legal. Nothing here says the employer knew, still less that it directed anyone.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Employers behind more than one donor

Across the whole cycle rather than a single day. Weaker than the table above, and included because a slow accumulation from one workplace is still worth being able to see.

Employers with more than one contributor
Employer	Donors	Total
unk	3	$1,495

Only 24.1% of itemised donors stated an employer. The field is filled in by the donor and left blank more often than not, so both employer tables show what we can see rather than everything that exists. Treat the counts as a floor. Occupations reported in the employer box — “retired”, “self-employed” — are excluded, because they are not a shared workplace.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28

Money out — where it went

$33,870

total spent

88.6%

of what it raised

Spending as a share of contributions received.

largest payees listed

Who it paid

Largest payees, with the category the committee chose when filing. A consultancy, printer or polling firm appearing across many committees is a fact about who runs campaigns in Washington.

Largest payees reported by this committee
Payee	Amount	Payments	Category as filed
Jim Hunter & Associates	$4,160	1	Other
Hangar 51	$4,000	1	Other
Carefree of Colorado	$3,685	1	Other
Rantz Jason	$2,500	1	Other
SPIN TEES	$2,412	2	Other
NICHOLSON & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE LLC	$2,143	1	Other
COUTURE TRAVIS	$1,000	1	Other
MACEWEN DREW	$1,000	1	Other
GRIFFEY DAN	$1,000	1	Other
BARKIS ANDREW	$1,000	1	Other
Bouzie Bougie Bartenders & Events	$850	1	Other
THE WEBSTAURANT STORE	$749	1	Other
O'SULLIVAN KEVIN	$600	1	Other
COSTCO	$508	3	Other
Tag Awards & Specialty	$448	1	Other

A further $2,056 was reported as small expenses. Washington lets a committee report spending below a threshold as a single lump with no payee. That money is in the total above and cannot be broken out by anyone, including us.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings · as of 2026-07-28

Does it add up

The arithmetic, in the open. Reported contributions less reported spending is what the committee should still be holding.

Reported contributions $38,230

Reported expenditures − $33,870

Implied balance $4,361

This is what the two filings imply, not a bank balance. Committees also report cash on hand directly, and the two figures can differ where a report is outstanding.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

Across cycles

Other filings under the same PDC committee id.

Only one cycle on file. We hold a single filing for committee 19643. That means it registered for one election, or that our sync covers only the cycles this one falls in — the filings do not distinguish the two.

Last checked 2026-07-28

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

Who is really behind a committee that funds this one: We show every contributor the committee reported, and how much of its money came from organisations rather than individuals. A committee funded by another committee is common, and following that chain to the people at the end of it means joining filings across organisations and cycles — a join we have not made, and one that would be wrong to guess at.
Who the independent spending was aimed at: The filings name the candidate or measure each independent expenditure supported or opposed. We hold the amounts and which way they cut, but have not joined them to those records, so the page says how much and not against whom.
Whether the spending worked: We hold what was raised, what was spent, and in some cases the result. Connecting them would be a causal claim from two numbers, and spending is not the only thing that moves an election.
Anything below the itemisation threshold: Washington lets small contributions and small expenses be reported as lump sums with no counterparty. That money is in the totals and cannot be broken out by anyone, including the PDC. Where a lump is large, the page says so.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Thurston County Republican Central Committee (TCRP),” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-07-28, accessed 2026-08-09. https://washingtonindependents.org/committee/thurston-county-republican-central-committee-tcrp/

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

Public Disclosure Commission committee filings: Registration, contribution and expenditure totals, and the largest reported contributors. The original record is at the PDC.
Not loaded: Itemised expenditures, contributor employers, gift-size banding, and independent expenditure filings. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.