Political committee · Washington State

YAKIMA COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE (NE) (YCRCC)

YAKIMA COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE (NE) (YCRCC) is a political committee registered with the Washington Public Disclosure Commission for the 2026 cycle. It reported $26,455 from 104 contributors.

  • 2026 cycle
  • Political Committee
  • 104 contributors

$26,455

raised

$65,404

spent

$254

average contribution

The total divided by the reported contributor count.

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

01

Money in — who funds this committee

The largest reported contributions. Washington requires committees to itemise contributions above a threshold; smaller gifts are reported in aggregate.

Largest reported contributors
Contributor City Amount
Corry Chris Yakima $5,500
Elect Manny Ruiz Yakima $3,901
Stephens Frieda Yakima $2,500
SMALL CONTRIBUTIONS $2,165
Steadfast Church LLC Yakima $1,800
Miscellaneous Cash Donations (low-cost fundraiser) Yakima $1,300
Melania Movie (low-cost fundraiser) Yakima $881
MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS Norwalk $694
Colleen Sheahan Yakima $650
Crabb Kellie Yakima $520
Baker Jeff Yakima $500
Harfst Lutz Yakima $500
Brown Doug Yakima $500
Curtis Kyle Yakima $500
Hanses Rita Yakima $500
Matt Brown Elect for Yakima City Council Yakima $435
Kiel Mary Marysville $400
Brown Matt Yakima $365
Cash Donations (low-cost fundraiser) Yakima $360
Cash Donations (low-cost fundraiser) $320

Contributions are not broken down by size, and employers are not named. Washington collects an employer field for individual contributions, and gift-size banding is what separates a committee funded by a hundred neighbours from one funded by three donors. We store only the largest contributors, so neither analysis is possible here — and computing concentration from a top-ten list would produce a confident number that is simply wrong.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28 · $24,292 of $26,455 shown across 20 of 104 contributors

02

How concentrated the money is

Computed from every itemised contribution rather than from the largest few, which is what makes the share meaningful.

77.7%

from the top 10 donors

Out of 104 itemised contributors in total.

104

itemised contributors

Who it came from

The PDC types every contributor. This does not follow a PAC’s own money back to a person — see what this page will not compute — but it does say how much arrived from individuals rather than from other organisations.

Contributions by contributor type
Contributor type Amount Share Gifts
Individual $14,155 63.7% 44
Business $4,743 21.4% 4
Other $1,749 7.9% 5
Low-cost Fundraiser $1,561 7% 3

Source Public Disclosure Commission contribution filings · as of 2026-07-28

03

Money out — where it went

$65,404

total spent

247.2%

of what it raised

Above 100% means it spent more this cycle than it took in — ordinary for a committee carrying a balance forward.

15

largest payees listed

Who it paid

Largest payees, with the category the committee chose when filing. A consultancy, printer or polling firm appearing across many committees is a fact about who runs campaigns in Washington.

Largest payees reported by this committee
Payee Amount Payments Category as filed
Gusto $26,320 24 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Outreach Inc PA $20,000 1 Fundraising events and related costs
McCormick Aircraft Hangars $3,824 4 Rent, lease, mortgage, PO box rental
Yakima Convention Center $3,147 1 Fundraising events and related costs
Assurance Healthcare and Counseling Center $1,505 7 Wages, salaries, benefits, payroll taxes
Priceline $1,350 2 Travel, accommodations, meals
Mercy Theaters $1,000 1 Other
Holiday Inn $778 2 Travel, accommodations, meals
Superior Office Solutions $650 2 Office supplies, furniture, staff food & beverages, etc.
Caffery Photo $500 1 Fundraising events and related costs
Yakima County Republican Women's Club $500 1 Charity
Washington State Republican Party $490 3 Other
Spectrum $422 4 Computers, printers, software, phones, etc.
Window Flair Inc $383 1 Office supplies, furniture, staff food & beverages, etc.
Armstrong Jill $328 1 Office supplies, furniture, staff food & beverages, etc.

A further $3,620 was reported as small expenses. Washington lets a committee report spending below a threshold as a single lump with no payee. That money is in the total above and cannot be broken out by anyone, including us.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings · as of 2026-07-28

04

Does it add up

The arithmetic, in the open. Reported contributions less reported spending is what the committee should still be holding.

Reported contributions $26,455
Reported expenditures − $65,404
Overspend $38,948

This committee reports spending more than it raised. That is not necessarily an error and is not an accusation. Contribution and expenditure reports are filed on different schedules, so a committee can appear overdrawn simply because its latest contribution report has not landed yet. We publish the subtraction rather than hiding it; the filings themselves are linked below.

Last checked 2026-07-28

Source Public Disclosure Commission committee filings · as of 2026-07-28

05

Across cycles

Other filings under the same PDC committee id.

Only one cycle on file. We hold a single filing for committee 22004. That means it registered for one election, or that our sync covers only the cycles this one falls in — the filings do not distinguish the two.

Last checked 2026-07-28

06

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

Who is really behind a committee that funds this one
We show every contributor the committee reported, and how much of its money came from organisations rather than individuals. A committee funded by another committee is common, and following that chain to the people at the end of it means joining filings across organisations and cycles — a join we have not made, and one that would be wrong to guess at.
Who the independent spending was aimed at
The filings name the candidate or measure each independent expenditure supported or opposed. We hold the amounts and which way they cut, but have not joined them to those records, so the page says how much and not against whom.
Whether the spending worked
We hold what was raised, what was spent, and in some cases the result. Connecting them would be a causal claim from two numbers, and spending is not the only thing that moves an election.
Anything below the itemisation threshold
Washington lets small contributions and small expenses be reported as lump sums with no counterparty. That money is in the totals and cannot be broken out by anyone, including the PDC. Where a lump is large, the page says so.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“YAKIMA COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE (NE) (YCRCC),” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-07-28, accessed 2026-08-08. https://washingtonindependents.org/committee/yakima-county-republican-central-committee-ne-ycrcc/

06

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

Public Disclosure Commission committee filings
Registration, contribution and expenditure totals, and the largest reported contributors. The original record is at the PDC.
Not loaded
Itemised expenditures, contributor employers, gift-size banding, and independent expenditure filings. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.