Farmington Town Proposition No. 2 — Whitman County 2023

Farmington Town Proposition No. 2 — Whitman County 2023 was on the 2023 ballot in Whitman County, Washington. It passed with 55.6% voting yes, on 63 votes cast.

This page is not a recommendation. It sets the result, the arguments filed by both campaigns, and the money behind each side next to each other, from the same sources, on one page.

  • 2023
  • Whitman County
  • City Measure
  • Proposition 2
  • Passed

Source WA Secretary of State official election results · as of 2026-09-05

01

The result

55.6%

voted yes

Passed

certified outcome

63

votes cast on this measure

Yes 55.6% · No 44.4%

Source WA Secretary of State certified election results · as of 2026-09-05 · note certified canvass, not election-night returns

02

What it costs you

We cannot calculate what this measure costs a household. That figure needs the levy rate per thousand dollars of assessed value, and the result export does not carry it — it records how people voted, not what they were voting on. We will not estimate it: a wrong number on a household tax bill is worse than no number. The rate is published in the county assessor’s levy certification and in the voters’ pamphlet for the election.

Last checked 2026-09-05

03

The case for and the case against

Printed in the county voters’ pamphlet and mailed to every voter in the jurisdiction. Written by committees the jurisdiction appointed, and reproduced here exactly as they wrote them.

The pamphlet for this measure has not been loaded. Pro and con statements are published by the county that ran the election, in a pamphlet PDF. We have loaded Whitman County so far, and only for the elections whose pamphlets are still retrievable — counties remove them when the next election is published. This measure’s statements exist; we do not hold them.

Last checked 2026-09-05

04

Who is funding each side

Political committees registered with the Public Disclosure Commission whose registration names this measure — the same year, county, proposition number and jurisdiction.

Committee registrations have not been matched to this page yet. This page was written before committee registrations were matched to measures. The match arrives with the next import; until then this section says nothing about whether any committee formed.

Last checked 2026-09-05

05

What this county has asked before

Other city measures put to Whitman County voters. Matched on county and measure kind — the results export carries no jurisdiction key, so these are comparable measures rather than provably the same body asking again.

Source WA Secretary of State certified election results · as of 2026-09-05 · n 8 of 8 passed · note listed with the threshold that applied at the time; history, not a prediction

06 · component 08

Connected records

Everything below is a link some document draws for us. Nothing here is our inference. Grouped by how well the record supports it, always in this order, never sorted by interest.

Nothing on file

This measure has no node in the graph yet. The graph adds a measure only with a SUPPORTS or OPPOSES edge, drawn where one committee’s C-1 registration resolves to exactly one certified measure on year, county, ballot number and jurisdiction name; no registration in the PDC extract we hold resolved to this one on that key, which is not the same as no committee having formed for or against it. The funding section above matches committees on proposition number and year only, with no county or jurisdiction, so a committee listed there can have no edge here. Shared-agent and shared-treasurer observations are not in the graph — the PDC extract we hold carries neither field, so the adjacency this page is designed to reference has no document yet.

Checked 2026-09-05

Source the edge table, counted and paged by tier · as of 2026-09-05 · edges 0 filed, 0 composite, 0 adjacency · how edges are built

07

What this page will not compute

Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.

No forecast.
No projection of the result from prior measures, turnout, money raised, or anything else. We do not run a model, and would not publish one here if we did.
No net money figure.
Contributions and independent expenditures are separate ledgers, and money for is not subtracted from money against. Both totals are published; the difference between them is not a quantity we report.
No motive from an amount.
A five-figure contribution from a firefighters’ local is a fact. What it was intended to buy is not on any filing, and we do not supply it.
No “outside money” count.
The address on a contribution is the giver’s mailing address, which is not proof of where they live, work, or own property. We publish the addresses as filed and draw no boundary around them.
No revenue estimate of our own.
Each campaign’s figure for what a levy raises is labelled as that campaign’s. Washington requires no independent fiscal note for a local measure, and we do not invent one.
No cost per person.
A levy falls on assessed property value, not on residents. Dividing a district’s revenue by its population would produce a number that describes no household — which is a different refusal from the one below, where the rate itself is missing.
What it costs a household
Requires the levy rate per thousand of assessed value, which the results export does not carry. Stated above rather than estimated.
Whether the money decided it
We can show what each side raised and what the vote was. Connecting the two would be an inference about cause from two numbers, and campaign spending is not the only thing that moves a local levy.
Whether this is the same body asking again
Earlier measures are matched on county and kind, not on jurisdiction — the export has no jurisdiction key. A school district and its neighbour both appear as school measures in the same county.
What the measure would have done
The ballot title and the full text are not loaded. We hold the result, not the proposal.

08

Common questions

Did Farmington Town Proposition No. 2 — Whitman County 2023 pass?
Yes, it passed. 55.6% voted yes on 63 votes cast.
Which Proposition 2 is this?
Proposition 2 on the 2023 ballot in Whitman County, Washington. Several different measures can carry the same number on one county ballot, so the year, the county and the body asking are all needed to identify one.
Where do these results come from?
The Washington Secretary of State’s certified election results. We publish the certified canvass, not election-night returns.
Why is there no argument for or against here?
Washington publishes committee-written for and against statements for most local measures. We have not ingested them. Showing one side without the other would be worse than showing neither.

Answers are generated from the same fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“Farmington Town Proposition No. 2 — Whitman County 2023,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-05, accessed 2026-11-08. https://washingtonindependents.org/measure/2023-whitman-prop-2-farmington-town-proposition-no-2/

JSON endpointReport a correction

Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.

09

How this page is built

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

WA Secretary of State certified election results
The vote totals, the yes share and the outcome. Certified canvass, not election-night returns.
Public Disclosure Commission committee registrations
Committees formed for or against the measure, matched by the proposition number they registered. Committees that did not name a number are not linked here.
Not loaded
Ballot title and full text, the voters’ pamphlet for and against statements, and the levy rate. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.
Whose words these are
The result and the canvass are public record, republished under CC BY 4.0. The statements for and against are not ours and are not public domain: they remain the work of the committees that filed them, reproduced here unedited because paraphrasing an argument is arguing with it.
We do not endorse ballot measures on this path
No measure page recommends a vote. Where Washington Independents has taken a position on a measure it appears at /positions/, labelled as opinion, and it is linked from nowhere inside this page.

Reporting that cites this record

Listed because each story cites this record, newest first. Stories are signed and in our voice; nothing from them appears in the record above.

No story cites this record yet. A story cites a record through the entity graph, which holds no node for this one yet, so no story can be listed here until it does. All reporting