City of Seattle Proposition No. 2 — King County 2025
City of Seattle Proposition No. 2 — King County 2025 was on the 2025 ballot in King County, Washington. It passed with 71% voting yes, on 268,513 votes cast.
This page is not a recommendation. It sets the result, the arguments filed by both campaigns, and the money behind each side next to each other, from the same sources, on one page.
2025
King County
City Measure
Proposition 2
Passed
Source WA Secretary of State official election results · as of 2026-09-05
01
The result
71%
voted yes
Passed
certified outcome
268,513
votes cast on this measure
Yes 71% ·
No 29%
Source WA Secretary of State certified election results · as of 2026-09-05 · note certified canvass, not election-night returns
02
What it costs you
We cannot calculate what this measure costs a household. That figure needs the levy rate per thousand dollars of assessed value, and the result export does not carry it — it records how people voted, not what they were voting on. We will not estimate it: a wrong number on a household tax bill is worse than no number. The rate is published in the county assessor’s levy certification and in the voters’ pamphlet for the election.
Last checked 2026-09-05
03
The case for and the case against
Printed in the county voters’ pamphlet and mailed to every voter in the jurisdiction. Written by committees the jurisdiction appointed, and reproduced here exactly as they wrote them.
Statement in favor
Filed by Bruce Harrell, Alexis Mercedes Rinck, Tanya Nguyen yesseattleprop2.com
This measure will make Seattle’s tax code more fair, reduce taxes for small and neighborhood businesses, and protect investments in housing, public safety, and social services from devastating Trump cuts. With a modest shift in Seattle’s Business & Occupation Tax (B&O) to the city’s largest corporations, Proposition 2 reduces the burden on 90% of Seattle employers, and eliminates city B&O taxes for over 75% of our smallest businesses. This relief will help struggling retailers and restaurants citywide, stabilize consumer prices, and protect local jobs. While tax relief for small businesses is permanent, other provisions sunset in 2033, ensuring we can adjust policies to meet the economic needs of our city. All funds are subject to audits for accountability. Proposition 2 will help safeguard our city from Trump’s cuts by protecting programs working class families depend on and keeping vulnerable people housed and fed. Without these programs, our overdose crisis and homelessness emergency will get worse. This innovative proposal is endorsed by employers – including voices for women and minority-owned businesses– as well as unions, Mayor Bruce Harrell, Councilmember Alexis Mercedes Rinck, and leaders in the fight for tax fairness. Please vote Yes on Proposition 2. Rebuttal of statement in opposition Seattle’s small businesses keep neighborhoods alive and provide local jobs. Prop 2 delivers real relief by eliminating B&O taxes for firms under $2 million about 3 of 4 so they can pay workers, cover rent, and stay open. The largest 10% of companies will contribute more, generating $80–90 million a year for safer streets, transportation, housing, and human services. That fair balance supports small shops and vital services. Vote Yes to protect jobs and keep Seattle strong.
Length 271 words · reproduced unedited
Statement in opposition
Filed by Eugene Wasserman eugene@ecwassociates.com
Seattle’s tax system differs from that of many other US cities. Seattle businesses contribute a significantly higher percentage of the Seattle City Government’s costs compared to businesses in other cities. For most Seattle residents, the Seattle City Government offers a tax bargain. To continue this bargain for Seattle residents, Seattle’s existing businesses must grow, and new companies must move in. Many Seattle businesses are struggling. Others have decided to leave the city. Just look at the vacant locations of former local or national retail stores downtown and the 31 percent vacancy rate in downtown office space. Maintaining healthy business growth across small, medium, and large businesses is essential. While Prop 2 provides a tax break to small companies, it more than doubles the tax burden for medium and large companies. Several years ago, the City’s jump-start tax was placed on Seattle’s large businesses, primarily those in the tech sector. Since then, Microsoft has removed all its businesses from Seattle. Amazon has laid off 10,000 employees, relocated employees to Bellevue, and established new business units in other parts of the US. Simply taxing businesses will not solve the Seattle Government’s long-term issues. Vote No on Seattle Prop 2. Rebuttal of statement in favor Seattle’s B&O tax system is not a business income tax; it is a gross receipts tax. Some tax relief will be going to a person who makes a million dollars a year, and penalize low-margin profit businesses. The tax increase is not a modest shift, but an over- doubling of the B&O tax. If Seattle gets a reputation as a bad business environment, more Seattle residents will be unemployed and homeless.
Length 278 words · reproduced unedited
Neither statement is fact-checked, by the county or by us. King County Elections prints these as the committees submit them and does not correct punctuation, grammar, or accuracy. They are arguments, not findings. We reproduce them because they are what voters were sent, and we take no position on the claims in either one.
Last checked 2026-09-05
Source King County local voters’ pamphlet, statements filed by the appointed pro and con committees · as of 2026-09-05 · where page 91 of the pamphlet · edits none · how we handle missing statements
Political committees registered with the Public Disclosure Commission whose registration names this measure — the same year, county, proposition number and jurisdiction.
Committee registrations have not been matched to this page yet. This page was written before committee registrations were matched to measures. The match arrives with the next import; until then this section says nothing about whether any committee formed.
Last checked 2026-09-05
05
What this county has asked before
Other city measures put to King County voters. Matched on county and measure kind — the results export carries no jurisdiction key, so these are comparable measures rather than provably the same body asking again.
Source WA Secretary of State certified election results · as of 2026-09-05 · n 5 of 8 passed · note listed with the threshold that applied at the time; history, not a prediction
06 · component 08
Connected records
Everything below is a link some document draws for us. Nothing here is our inference. Grouped by how well the record supports it, always in this order, never sorted by interest.
Shared-agent and shared-treasurer observations are not in the graph — the PDC extract we hold carries neither field, so the adjacency this page is designed to reference has no document yet.
Checked 2026-09-05
Source the edge table, counted and paged by tier · as of 2026-09-05 · edges 0 filed, 2 composite, 0 adjacency · how edges are built
07
What this page will not compute
Each of these is a number a reader might reasonably expect. None of them follow from the records we hold, so we do not publish them.
No forecast.
No projection of the result from prior measures, turnout, money raised, or anything else. We do not run a model, and would not publish one here if we did.
No net money figure.
Contributions and independent expenditures are separate ledgers, and money for is not subtracted from money against. Both totals are published; the difference between them is not a quantity we report.
No motive from an amount.
A five-figure contribution from a firefighters’ local is a fact. What it was intended to buy is not on any filing, and we do not supply it.
No “outside money” count.
The address on a contribution is the giver’s mailing address, which is not proof of where they live, work, or own property. We publish the addresses as filed and draw no boundary around them.
No revenue estimate of our own.
Each campaign’s figure for what a levy raises is labelled as that campaign’s. Washington requires no independent fiscal note for a local measure, and we do not invent one.
No cost per person.
A levy falls on assessed property value, not on residents. Dividing a district’s revenue by its population would produce a number that describes no household — which is a different refusal from the one below, where the rate itself is missing.
What it costs a household
Requires the levy rate per thousand of assessed value, which the results export does not carry. Stated above rather than estimated.
Whether the money decided it
We can show what each side raised and what the vote was. Connecting the two would be an inference about cause from two numbers, and campaign spending is not the only thing that moves a local levy.
Whether this is the same body asking again
Earlier measures are matched on county and kind, not on jurisdiction — the export has no jurisdiction key. A school district and its neighbour both appear as school measures in the same county.
What the measure would have done
The ballot title and the full text are not loaded. We hold the result, not the proposal.
08
Common questions
Did City of Seattle Proposition No. 2 — King County 2025 pass?
Yes, it passed. 71% voted yes on 268,513 votes cast.
Which Proposition 2 is this?
Proposition 2 on the 2025 ballot in King County, Washington. Several different measures can carry the same number on one county ballot, so the year, the county and the body asking are all needed to identify one.
Where do these results come from?
The Washington Secretary of State’s certified election results. We publish the certified canvass, not election-night returns.
Why is there no argument for or against here?
Washington publishes committee-written for and against statements for most local measures. We have not ingested them. Showing one side without the other would be worse than showing neither.
Answers are generated from the same fields as the sections above and emitted as FAQPage structured data, so a machine reader gets the identical text a person sees.
Cite this page
This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.
“City of Seattle Proposition No. 2 — King County 2025,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-05, accessed 2026-11-09. https://washingtonindependents.org/measure/2025-king-prop-2-city-of-seattle-proposition-no-2/
Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.
09
How this page is built
Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.
WA Secretary of State certified election results
The vote totals, the yes share and the outcome. Certified canvass, not election-night returns.
Public Disclosure Commission committee registrations
Committees formed for or against the measure, matched by the proposition number they registered. Committees that did not name a number are not linked here.
Not loaded
Ballot title and full text, the voters’ pamphlet for and against statements, and the levy rate. Each is named where the page would otherwise use it.
Whose words these are
The result and the canvass are public record, republished under CC BY 4.0. The statements for and against are not ours and are not public domain: they remain the work of the committees that filed them, reproduced here unedited because paraphrasing an argument is arguing with it.
We do not endorse ballot measures on this path
No measure page recommends a vote. Where Washington Independents has taken a position on a measure it appears at /positions/, labelled as opinion, and it is linked from nowhere inside this page.
Reporting that cites this record
Listed because each story cites this record, newest first. Stories are signed and in our voice; nothing from them appears in the record above.
No story cites this record yet. The list fills itself when one does; nobody adds a story here by hand. All reporting