Political firm · composite — 2 spellings of the payee name, merged by us

THE SPOKESMAN REVIEW

Disclosed payments to 2 filed spellings of this payee name total $32,809 from 17 candidate committees and 5 political committees, 2021–2026. In 1 case a candidate and an independent-expenditure committee in the same race both paid it; section 03 lists each. A shared vendor is lawful; this page documents disclosed payments and nothing else.

$32,809

disclosed payments

to 2 spellings of the payee name, merged by us · as filed, 2021–2026

22

paying committees

17 candidate, 5 political

1

same-race overlaps

lawful; each listed in section 03 with its gap in days

2

spellings merged

the size of the identity join behind every figure here; section 04

Sources Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings (tijg-9zyp) · independent-expenditure filings (67cp-h962), data.wa.gov · as of 2026-09-05 · retrieved 2026-09-05 · key payee name as filed, upper-cased, punctuation and corporate suffixes (LLC, Inc, Co…) stripped — a normalised string, not an identifier the PDC issues · tier composite — joined by us on a stated key

01

Who paid this firm

Every paying committee, largest disclosed total first. The total is what that committee reported paying to 2 spellings of the payee name, merged by us; where a committee has a page here, its name links to it.

Committees that reported paying THE SPOKESMAN REVIEW, by disclosed total
Paid by Kind Cycles Disclosed payments
Kathleen McNair Telis (Kate Telis) — CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF SPOKANE candidate committee 2025 $4,122
Debra L Conklin (DEB CONKLIN) — COUNTY PROSECUTOR, SPOKANE CO candidate committee 2022 $3,260
Lacrecia M. Hill (Lacrecia "Lu"Hill) — CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF SPOKANE candidate committee 2021 $2,984
Sal Mungia — STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT candidate committee 2024 $2,514
Michael Andrew Lish (Mike Lish) — CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF SPOKANE candidate committee 2021 $2,419
SPOKANE COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE political committee 2023 $2,086
Maggie Yates — COUNTY COMMISSIONER, SPOKANE CO candidate committee 2022 $1,658
Citizen Advocates for Parks (CAP) political committee 2025 $1,624
Citizens for Spokane Schools (CFSS) political committee 2025 $1,624
Gregory M. Miller (Greg Miller) — STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT candidate committee 2026 $1,589
Timothy B Fennessy — SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT candidate committee 2024 $1,588
Randy McGlenn II — CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF SPOKANE candidate committee 2023 $1,247
STUCKART BEN T (Ben Stuckart) — STATE REPRESENTATIVE, LEG DISTRICT 03 – HOUSE candidate committee 2024 $1,000
Michaela Kelso — State Representative, Leg District 06 – House candidate committee 2026 $832
SARAH DIXIT (Sarah Dixit) — CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF SPOKANE candidate committee 2025 $756
James A Johnson (James "JJ" Johnson) — CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY candidate committee 2021 $718
Spokane County Democratic Central Committee (SCDCC) political committee 2024 $666
Spokane Community Against Racism PAC (SCAR PAC) political committee 2022 $545
CHRIS REYKDAL (Chris Reykdal) — SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, State of Washington candidate committee 2024 $501
Michael S Wiser (Mike Wiser) — SCHOOL DIRECTOR, SPOKANE SD 081 candidate committee 2023 $439
Deanna K Crull — DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, SPOKANE CO DIST CT-SPOKANE candidate committee 2022 $405
Suzanne Annette Schmidt (Suzanne Schmidt) — STATE REPRESENTATIVE, LEG DISTRICT 04 – HOUSE candidate committee 2022 $231

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings (tijg-9zyp), 2021–2026 · as of 2026-09-05 · rows 22 · retrieved 2026-09-05 · key payee name as filed, upper-cased, punctuation and corporate suffixes (LLC, Inc, Co…) stripped — a normalised string, not an identifier the PDC issues · caveat a payment routed through this firm to a subvendor appears here under this firm, as filed

02

Payments by cycle

Disclosed payments to 2 spellings of the payee name, merged by us, by the election year the paying committee filed under. One bar scale; the figure beside each bar is the figure. Odd years are local elections and even years state and federal, so consecutive years are not comparable.

  1. 2021

    local cycle

    $6,121
  2. 2022

    state and federal cycle

    $6,100
  3. 2023

    local cycle

    $3,772
  4. 2024

    state and federal cycle

    $6,269
  5. 2025

    local cycle

    $8,126
  6. 2026

    state and federal cycle

    $2,421

Source Public Disclosure Commission expenditure filings (tijg-9zyp), election_year as filed · as of 2026-09-05 · scale $8,126 = full width · key payee name as filed, upper-cased, punctuation and corporate suffixes (LLC, Inc, Co…) stripped — a normalised string, not an identifier the PDC issues

03

Same race, both sides of the wall

A candidate’s committee and a committee making independent expenditures in that candidate’s race may not coordinate; both may hire the same printer. Each row is a race where both paid this firm, with the days between the last candidate payment and the first independent expenditure, and whether that gap falls inside the twelve-month window in which WAC 390-05-210 presumes coordination unless rebutted. Overlap is lawful. This table is a list of coincidences in public filings, not a finding.

Races in which a candidate committee and an independent-expenditure committee both paid this firm
Year Race Candidate client IE committee client Gap in days In the window Shared officer
2023 CITY COUNCIL MEMBER / CITY OF SPOKANE Randy McGlenn II $1,247 SPOKANE COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE $2,086 102 yes none — both registrations read

Source Same-race overlap layer over PDC expenditure (tijg-9zyp) and independent-expenditure (67cp-h962) filings; committee registrations for the officer column · as of 2026-09-01 · rows 1 · n 1 inside the twelve-month window · key race = the candidate’s office and jurisdiction as filed; the IE committee’s target is that candidate · caveat overlap is lawful and is not a finding of coordination

04

How these records were merged

The PDC issues no vendor identifier. Every figure on this page is the sum of rows whose payee name normalises to one string: THE SPOKESMAN REVIEW. That is our join, not the state’s, and its size is 2 spellings of the payee name, merged by us.

The key
payee name as filed, upper-cased, punctuation and corporate suffixes (LLC, Inc, Co…) stripped — a normalised string, not an identifier the PDC issues
Spellings merged
  • THE SPOKESMAN REVIEW 14 payer-year rows
  • THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 8 payer-year rows
What a wrong merge looks like
Two different firms whose names differ only in a suffix or punctuation would be one row here, and their totals would be added. Two spellings of one firm that differ in a word would be two rows, and this page would be short a spelling. Both errors are ours; neither is in the filings. Corrections are taken at the address in the cite block.
Why this is not a graph node
The entity graph’s vendor nodes are one per disclosed identity and are never merged by name. This profile is the opposite decision, made for reading, and it is kept out of the graph so a merge of ours never becomes an edge.

Source Payee names as filed in PDC expenditure reports, normalised by build-vendors.js · as of 2026-09-05 · n 2 spellings over 22 payer-year rows · tier composite — joined by us on the key above

05

What this page will not compute

A firm page is where a reader expects a verdict about the firm. Each of these would be one, and none follows from payee rows on a form.

No finding of coordination.
Overlap is lawful. A candidate and an independent-expenditure committee hiring the same firm is two contracts, and the twelve-month window in section 03 is a presumption the law lets either party rebut. The table lists the coincidence and stops.
No share of a race.
What fraction of a race’s spending went through this firm would need every committee’s every payment, resolved to the same merge. We do not have that, and a share computed from part of it would be wrong with confidence.
No “network”.
Clients who share a vendor are not connected to each other by that fact. A diagram of them would draw relationships the filings do not record.
No company facts.
This page describes payments to spellings of a name. It does not say what the firm is, who owns it, or what it did for the money; the expenditure description field is not reliable enough to summarise.
No connected-records section.
A merged profile is not a node in the entity graph and draws no edges. The graph’s vendor nodes are one per disclosed identity; this page is deliberately not one of them.

Cite this page

This is public-records reporting. Use it, and say where it came from.

“THE SPOKESMAN REVIEW — Washington political firm profile,” WashingtonIndependents.org, data as of 2026-09-05, accessed 2026-09-20. https://washingtonindependents.org/firms/the-spokesman-review/

JSON endpointReport a correction

Our tables, figures and notes on this page are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them, including commercially, with attribution. The underlying records are public records of the State of Washington and were never ours to license.

06

Where this page comes from

Every figure above is read from a primary source and rebuilt on a schedule. Nothing here is modelled or inferred; where a source is silent the page says so rather than filling the gap.

Why this firm has a page
Appears in the same-race overlap layer. Profiles exist for the firms in the independent-expenditures and coordination analysis, not for every payee; a listing is a description of disclosed payments.
Identity
payee name as filed, upper-cased, punctuation and corporate suffixes (LLC, Inc, Co…) stripped — a normalised string, not an identifier the PDC issues This profile merges 2 spellings of the payee name, merged by us; section 04 lists them.
Payments
PDC expenditure filings (tijg-9zyp), election years 2021–2026, summed per paying committee. Amounts as filed; subvendor pass-throughs appear under the reported payee.
Overlaps
the same-race overlap layer over the expenditure and independent-expenditure filings (67cp-h962), as of 2026-09-01. Gap in days is from the last candidate payment to the first independent expenditure; the window is WAC 390-05-210’s twelve months. A shared officer is named only where both committees’ registrations were read.
Retrieved
expenditures 2026-09-05 · independent expenditures 2026-09-05, from data.wa.gov, per the import log.